1981
DOI: 10.1016/0009-8981(81)90236-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum and plasma zinc concentrations with special reference to standardized sampling procedure and protein status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found by Foley et al. (1968) that plasma Zn was 16% higher than in serum, although later studies have shown no significant or only very little difference between serum and plasma Zn concentrations, therefore, making them comparable ( Kosman and Henkin, 1979 ; Kasperek et al., 1981 ; Kiilerich et al., 1981 ; Chen et al., 1986 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found by Foley et al. (1968) that plasma Zn was 16% higher than in serum, although later studies have shown no significant or only very little difference between serum and plasma Zn concentrations, therefore, making them comparable ( Kosman and Henkin, 1979 ; Kasperek et al., 1981 ; Kiilerich et al., 1981 ; Chen et al., 1986 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After centrifugation the separated serum was stored in plastic tubes at 4°C prior to analysis. Serum was employed despite an earlier report of increased zinc content of serum compared with plasma (Foley et al, 1968), as recent evidence indicates no significant difference (Kiilerich et al, 1981). Analysis of zinc was by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (Pye SP192).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies comparing heparinized plasma and serum, either no difference in zinc concentrations between serum and plasma were observed (16,17) or a small difference was noted (15). In the latter study slightly higher serum values were attributed to the partial disintegration of platelets during serum clot retraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%