1969
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)62391-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serratia Marcescens Infection of the Urinary Tract: A Nosocomial Infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1970
1970
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding these difficulties, it is certainly possible to gain a reasonably accurate idea of what is happening elsewhere, and the veritable spate of publications from the USA in recent years naming Serratia marcescens as a pathogen (Atlas and Belding, 1968;Dodson, 1968;Nelms et al, 1968;Ringrose et al, 1968;Allen and Conger, 1969;Alexander etal, 1969;Altemeier et al, 1969;Cabrera, 1969;Quintiliani and Gifford, 1969) would certainly indicate that the organism is a fairly common cause of disease in that country. Our own impression, however, which incidentally was shared by all of the British bacteriologists with whom we had discussed this topic, was that Serratia marcescens is an uncommon, if not rare, clinically significant isolate in the bacteriology laboratory in this country.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding these difficulties, it is certainly possible to gain a reasonably accurate idea of what is happening elsewhere, and the veritable spate of publications from the USA in recent years naming Serratia marcescens as a pathogen (Atlas and Belding, 1968;Dodson, 1968;Nelms et al, 1968;Ringrose et al, 1968;Allen and Conger, 1969;Alexander etal, 1969;Altemeier et al, 1969;Cabrera, 1969;Quintiliani and Gifford, 1969) would certainly indicate that the organism is a fairly common cause of disease in that country. Our own impression, however, which incidentally was shared by all of the British bacteriologists with whom we had discussed this topic, was that Serratia marcescens is an uncommon, if not rare, clinically significant isolate in the bacteriology laboratory in this country.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1962, Ewing, Johnson & Davis reported that most serratia infections originated in hospital; later papers described the characteristics of serratia infection in the urinary tract (Taylor & Keane, 1962;Lancaster, 1962;Clayton & Von Graevenitz, 1966;Allen & Conger, 1969), in the respiratory tract (Cabrera, 1969) and at several different sites (McCracken & Lipscomb, 1965;Stenderup, Faergeman & Ingerslev, 1966;Stamm et al 1976; 3-2 Mutton, Brady & Markness, 1981;Anagnostakis et al 1981). Interest in such organisms stimulated several studies on their antigenic composition and on the possibilities of serological, biochemical and bacteriocin typing (Traub, Raymond & Startsman, 1971;Farmer, 1972;Edwards & Ewing, 1972;Grimont & Grimont, 1978;Branca et al 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nucleotide sequence of smfA, the gene encoding the major structural component of MR fimbriae, revealed that this gene encodes a 174-amino-acid polypeptide with a typical procaryotic signal peptide. The primary structure of the smfA product showed significant homology with the primary structure of the E. coli fimbrial subunit.Serratia marcescens is a bacterial species causing nosocomial infection in the urinary and respiratory tracts (3,16,17,30). Gram-negative bacteria isolated from patients with an urinary tract infection adhere to uroepithelial surfaces by bacterial surface appendages known as pili or fimbriae (13,15,43).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serratia marcescens is a bacterial species causing nosocomial infection in the urinary and respiratory tracts (3,16,17,30). Gram-negative bacteria isolated from patients with an urinary tract infection adhere to uroepithelial surfaces by bacterial surface appendages known as pili or fimbriae (13,15,43).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%