“…Recently, many non-noble pseudocapacitive electromaterials, especially phosphate electromaterials (e.g., Am Fe–Co 3 (PO 4 ) 2 , Ni–Co–TEP, Ni–Co hydrogen phosphate, Mn 3 (PO 4 ) 2 ·3H 2 O, Co 3 (PO 4 ) 2 ·8H 2 O, and Fe–InPO 4 ), also show the excellent OER property in the alkaline system because their electrochemical mechanisms both involve the high-efficiency charge transfer by activated metal elements and then undergo different redox reactions with the different applied potentials. , Thus, there are the same effect factors (e.g., morphology, conductivity, and porosity) for electromaterials in capacity and OER, and the abovementioned property could be improved by various physicochemical means (e.g., compositing other functional materials, doping heteroatom, ,, controlling the ratio of different transition metals, , and ultrasonic treatment). However, different from the simple redox energy-storage mechanism of the battery-type and pseudocapacitive electromaterials, OER is a more complex electrochemical reaction, which involves more electron transfer processes and the desorption of active species, , resulting in a possible result that the greater capacity of the electromaterial may not be indicating the stronger OER property. Interestingly, there are few reports about this question.…”