2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04473.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serotypes ofEscherichia coliin Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

Abstract: Aim:  To examine the diversity of Escherichia coli serotypes found in the intestinal contents of infants who died of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) compared with that in comparison infants. Methods and Results:  Over the 3‐year period, 1989–1991, in South Australia and Victoria (Australia), a total of 687 E. coli isolates from 231 patients with SIDS (348 isolates), 98 infants who had died from other causes (144 isolates) and 160 healthy infants (195 isolates) were studied. The isolates from patients with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This area of SIDS research having compiled considerable supportive evidence has had difficulties in achieving broad acceptance for reasons that are not immediately apparent but seem to be sustained by opinion outside scientific reason. The work is well supported by the findings of groups led by Blackwell [17-19], Morris [20,21], Smith [22], Bettelheim [23-26], Murrell [27] and Goldwater [16,26,28-31]. Goldwater's group extended the hypothesis to encompass inherent or acquired deficiency in pathogen recognition [32], which is predicated on the findings of significant sterile site bacterial infection [33,28], which is proposed to represent a footprint of commonly occurring bacteremic events of infancy and childhood [34] from which most individuals achieve uncomplicated recovery.…”
Section: Background and Leading Hypothesessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…This area of SIDS research having compiled considerable supportive evidence has had difficulties in achieving broad acceptance for reasons that are not immediately apparent but seem to be sustained by opinion outside scientific reason. The work is well supported by the findings of groups led by Blackwell [17-19], Morris [20,21], Smith [22], Bettelheim [23-26], Murrell [27] and Goldwater [16,26,28-31]. Goldwater's group extended the hypothesis to encompass inherent or acquired deficiency in pathogen recognition [32], which is predicated on the findings of significant sterile site bacterial infection [33,28], which is proposed to represent a footprint of commonly occurring bacteremic events of infancy and childhood [34] from which most individuals achieve uncomplicated recovery.…”
Section: Background and Leading Hypothesessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…We also found a considerable percentage (22% Puebla and 10% Sonora) of non-typable strains, which could be suggestive of new serotypes present in Mexico. Interestingly, some serotypes that were found have been associated with disease conditions in animals and unconventional situations such as corpses of infants with sudden death syndrome 64,65 . With these results, we could propose that UPEC strains are not serotypically restricted, because despite having found a great variety of serotypes, some are non-typables or are associated with other pathotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impairments we observed in lung structure and ventilatory stability due to maternal inflammation/infection may contribute to the increased risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in preterm infants. There is a wealth of supportive evidence linking SIDS to inflammation/infection, which includes autopsy findings of infection and inflammatory markers in SIDS victims (6,28,47,55) and an increased risk of SIDS in winter months (13). Unrecognized hypoxemia has also been firmly implicated in SIDS, with evidence including brain stem gliosis (39,48,74,76), elevated hypoxanthine in vitreous humor (53,64), and increased VEGF in cerebral spinal fluid (34) of SIDS victims.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%