2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10875-012-9806-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serotype-Specific Anti-Pneumococcal IgG and Immune Competence: Critical Differences in Interpretation Criteria When Different Methods are Used

Abstract: When applying current AAAAI guidelines, the xMAP Pneumo 14 assay does not allow reliable evaluation of antibody responses to polysaccharide antigens for the assessment of humoral immune competence. New guidelines for an adequate response should be established for new technologies when evaluating responses to polysaccharide vaccine in the clinical setting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative comparisons of PnAb levels measured by multiplex assays were not always consistent with results from WHO-based ELISA methods (15), and the performance characteristics of these assays often did not meet the criteria set in the original WHO document developed for ELISA testing. Intralaboratory comparisons of assays from different laboratories showed substantial variation in quantitative results even when the same basic technology was being utilized (16), although clinical classifications of patients were relatively unaffected by these quantitative variations using published algorithms (17,18).…”
Section: Multiplex Assaysmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Quantitative comparisons of PnAb levels measured by multiplex assays were not always consistent with results from WHO-based ELISA methods (15), and the performance characteristics of these assays often did not meet the criteria set in the original WHO document developed for ELISA testing. Intralaboratory comparisons of assays from different laboratories showed substantial variation in quantitative results even when the same basic technology was being utilized (16), although clinical classifications of patients were relatively unaffected by these quantitative variations using published algorithms (17,18).…”
Section: Multiplex Assaysmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Comparison of laboratories performing the WHO ELIZA show considerable variability in results [36]. The results from the WHO ELIZA cannot be compared with other commercially available assays, including the xMAP kit used on the Luminex platform [37]. Opsonophagocytic function has been measured in research laboratories, but is beyond the capability of most routine diagnostic laboratories [38,39].…”
Section: Critical Analysis Of the Esid/pagid Criteria For Cvidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique increases specificity by removing nonspecific antibodies. [16][17][18] Commercial laboratories have now adopted measurement of specific antibodies using Luminex. Results with this test vary from those obtained by ELISA.…”
Section: Specific Antibody Deficienciesmentioning
confidence: 99%