This paper focuses on the brain's clarity seeking process, what has been termed as Ambiguity relief process. "Ambiguity relief" has four quantifiable clarity seeking processes each with a predictable set of genes and neurotransmitters working on three different parts of the brain. With observation of the genetic foundations of some brain disorders, it was discovered that there were parallels in the brain's clarity processes. The hypothesis was that the Ambiguity Relief process was directly related to the sequence of taking action on ideas, projects or even buying decisions and this was further tested. Three models, Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument by Ned Herrmann, Human Dynamics work by Sandra Segal and David Horn, and Temperament and Character work by C. Cloninger were studied in-depth and there was overwhelming evidence that there were consistencies in how people got clarity when faced with solving problems, completing ideas, and understanding new information that did not change regardless of the environment or behavior.Copy Right, IJAR, 2017,. All rights reserved.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………….... Introduction:-The purpose of this paper is to simplify the larger scope of "Personality" to specific and consistently predictable functions that support human communication, reduce stress and miscommunication, and easier -more effective cooperation, improve teamwork, while understanding the unique processes humans have to achieve "clarity" and the subsequent requirements for taking action.In the search for an accurate model of "personality" and tools that support the identification of consistent traits that can classify people to improve personal and group effectiveness, it was discovered that multiple models that, while empirically sound, had opposite deductions. In investigating the big five personality traits (Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, Openness), it was found that many of these vary with time, environment and experience. This creates a transient state of "personality" which is inconsistent with the objective of finding consistently predictable functions of specific human behavior. So, the continued began with a presupposition.The presupposition going into this research was that behaviors do change over time and /or according to emotional events in a person's life. It was accepted that a brain's Neuroplasticity (The brain's ability to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections throughout life) can be responsible for modified ingrained behaviors. The objective was to find a set of consistencies that could be applied to a person's overall life and could be applied to better and easier understanding "How" they approach situations, problems and ideas.