2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-012-2921-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serotonin–glutamate and serotonin–dopamine reciprocal interactions as putative molecular targets for novel antipsychotic treatments: from receptor heterodimers to postsynaptic scaffolding and effector proteins

Abstract: The physical and functional interactions between serotonin-glutamate and serotonin-dopamine signaling have been suggested to be involved in psychosis pathophysiology and are supposed to be relevant for antipsychotic treatment. Type II metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) and serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptors have been reported to form heterodimers that modulate G-protein-mediated intracellular signaling differentially compared to mGluR2 and 5-HT(2A) homomers. Additionally, direct evidence has been provided tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 205 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, a complex link between 5-HT2A and dopamine tone appears to modulate brain activity (Di Pietro and Seamans, 2007;Lieberman et al, 1998). Consistently, 5-HT2A and D2 receptors are both located on prefrontal pyramidal and nonpyramidal neurons (Fink and Gothert, 2007;Goldman-Rakic, 1998, 2000;Seamans and Yang, 2004), and their signaling is also transmitted through the common intraneuronal pathways (Beaulieu, 2012;de Bartolomeis et al, 2013). Overall, these findings suggest that the relationship between D2 and 5-HT2A modulates neuronal function through multiple mechanisms, and that their balanced stimulation is crucial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, a complex link between 5-HT2A and dopamine tone appears to modulate brain activity (Di Pietro and Seamans, 2007;Lieberman et al, 1998). Consistently, 5-HT2A and D2 receptors are both located on prefrontal pyramidal and nonpyramidal neurons (Fink and Gothert, 2007;Goldman-Rakic, 1998, 2000;Seamans and Yang, 2004), and their signaling is also transmitted through the common intraneuronal pathways (Beaulieu, 2012;de Bartolomeis et al, 2013). Overall, these findings suggest that the relationship between D2 and 5-HT2A modulates neuronal function through multiple mechanisms, and that their balanced stimulation is crucial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Thus, genetically induced levels of 5-HT2A receptors may in turn interact with lower or greater expression of D2L postsynaptic receptors as a function of DRD2 variation in determining differential levels of stimulation of prefrontal pyramidal neurons or interneurons of relevance for cognitive processing. Another synergistic or alternative mechanism of the combined effect of rs1076560 and rs6314 on working memory processing is that stimulation of D2 and 5-HT2A receptors implicates intraneuronal adjustments that modulate common pathways including molecules such as AKT1 and GSK3beta (Beaulieu, 2012;de Bartolomeis et al, 2013), whose expression and related genetic variation have been associated with schizophrenia (Blasi et al, 2011(Blasi et al, , 2013bTan et al, 2008). In line with the relevance of common signaling cascades, current evidence also suggests that the cross-talk between D2 and 5-HT2A may be facilitated by the assembly of heteromers (Albizu et al, 2011;de Bartolomeis et al, 2013;Fuxe et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, AKT phosphorylates a diverse set of substrates including GSK3β [46]. 5-HT promotes interactions with a scaffolding and regulatory molecule, which results in the activation of PI3K/AKT [47]. Therefore, the PTEN may be a significant regulator of this pathway in mediating the ASD phenotype.…”
Section: Relationship Between Asd and Ptenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be hypothesized that patients with SRS have a more complex pathophysiology than patients who respond to FGAs or SGAs 12 ; thus, they may benefit from a multisite receptor effect (like the effect of amisulpride) rather than a stronger antidopaminergic effect. 13 Systems other than the dopaminergic one are likely involved in the pathophysiology of SRS and may represent the target of augmentation strategies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%