2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2014.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serotipos y patrones de resistencia antibiótica en aislados betahemolíticos de Streptococcus agalactiae de madres colonizadas y recién nacidos con enfermedad invasiva

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
4
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage of NT strains found resembles data reported by Liébana-Martos et al (2015), who detected 6.40% of these isolates [41]. This lack of reactivity with the agglutination test may be due to poor expression of the capsule.…”
Section: Serotype Determinationsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The percentage of NT strains found resembles data reported by Liébana-Martos et al (2015), who detected 6.40% of these isolates [41]. This lack of reactivity with the agglutination test may be due to poor expression of the capsule.…”
Section: Serotype Determinationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, studies conducted by Poyart et al (2007) and Imperi et al (2010) reported molecular methods that erroneously identified some strains [43,44]. Therefore, the use of two different techniques was suggested for special cases of NT strains [41].…”
Section: Serotype Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the streptococcus agalactiae infectious leading to early neonatal morbidity and mortality,the streptococcus agalactiae examination is important for pregnant women. Many meta-analysis studies shown that approximately 50% streptococcus agalactiae colonization pregnant women maybe transmit the bacteria by delivery process to their newborns now [27][28][29].The populations in developing or underdeveloped countries have different lifestyles, live in different geographical locations, different ages, socioeconomic levels, schooling, and gestational ages and have different importance for streptococcus agalactiae infectious [11,12,15,18,[30][31][32][33][34]. it is essential to improve and extend streptococcus agalactiae screening performance and accuracy in pregnant women, especially underdeveloped countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six studies reported that colonized pregnant women were referred for prophylaxis, 2–4,6,14,16 and the others presented screening information, but without an approach about prophylactic measures 18–20,26,29,30,41,42,49,50 . Among the pregnant women screened at delivery, only some were treated with antibiotics, whereas there was no report of any type of intervention in this regard in other studies 1,9,21,25,27,43,47 . Two studies dedicated to the study of GBS colonization in other gestational periods reported treatment through the use of antibiotics of pregnant women 15,24 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%