PTJ 2017
DOI: 10.25156/ptj.2017.7.3.47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii among Pregnant Women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed frequency of acute infection, inferred by IgM detection, in this study is slightly lower than recently reported by studies in Erbil city in 2017 (12.93%)(Abdullah and Mahmood 2017), and in 2019 (15.6%)(Akil Khudhair Al-Daoody et al 2019). This difference may be attributed to differences in diagnostic tests employed and differences in sample size (263 and 167 vs 520 samples in our study).Generally speaking, prevalence rates can vary widely and depend largely on local environmental factors, the region of study, cooking habits, hygienic standards, socio-economic status, and method of detection(Flegr et al 2014; Dama et al 2016).The observation of increased seropositivity for T. gondii in adult humans is consistent with the published literature.…”
contrasting
confidence: 81%
“…The observed frequency of acute infection, inferred by IgM detection, in this study is slightly lower than recently reported by studies in Erbil city in 2017 (12.93%)(Abdullah and Mahmood 2017), and in 2019 (15.6%)(Akil Khudhair Al-Daoody et al 2019). This difference may be attributed to differences in diagnostic tests employed and differences in sample size (263 and 167 vs 520 samples in our study).Generally speaking, prevalence rates can vary widely and depend largely on local environmental factors, the region of study, cooking habits, hygienic standards, socio-economic status, and method of detection(Flegr et al 2014; Dama et al 2016).The observation of increased seropositivity for T. gondii in adult humans is consistent with the published literature.…”
contrasting
confidence: 81%