Abstract:IMPORTANCE Although patients with cancer are at an increased risk of infection-related complications, few studies have characterized their vulnerability to measles and mumps. Given the recent outbreaks and increased community vaccine hesitancy, understanding measles and mumps immunity within this population is vital.
OBJECTIVESTo identify a point prevalence estimate of protective measles and mumps antibodies among ambulatory patients with cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this cross-sectional study,… Show more
“…We explored recall response to measles, where we observed that 81% of subjects were seropositive for measles serum antibodies, two subjects (Subject 3 and 10) are currently on active treatment with bcl-2 inhibitor and BTKi respectively and one is treatment naïve. This is a slightly higher response rate than was observed in a recent cross-sectional study of 959 patients 24 which detected a 63% measles seropositivity rate in subjects with hematological malignancies. The antibody response to measles seems largely unaffected in CLL subjects, indicating that LLPCs responsible for maintaining circulating serum antibodies remain stable throughout CLL immune dysfunction and treatment.…”
“…We explored recall response to measles, where we observed that 81% of subjects were seropositive for measles serum antibodies, two subjects (Subject 3 and 10) are currently on active treatment with bcl-2 inhibitor and BTKi respectively and one is treatment naïve. This is a slightly higher response rate than was observed in a recent cross-sectional study of 959 patients 24 which detected a 63% measles seropositivity rate in subjects with hematological malignancies. The antibody response to measles seems largely unaffected in CLL subjects, indicating that LLPCs responsible for maintaining circulating serum antibodies remain stable throughout CLL immune dysfunction and treatment.…”
“…Of those, two subjects (Subject 3 and 10) are currently on active treatment with bcl-2 inhibitor and BTKi respectively and one subject is treatment naïve. This is a slightly higher response rate than was observed in a recent cross-sectional study of 959 patients 34 which detected an overall 75% measles seropositivity rate in cancer subjects and lower (63% seropositivity) in those with hematological malignancies. Overall, the antibody response to measles seems largely unaffected in CLL subjects, indicating that long-lived plasma cells responsible for maintaining circulating serum antibodies remain stable throughout CLL immune dysfunction and treatment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…In this investigation, we explored the recall response to measles virus, a common childhood antigen exposed to either through vaccination or natural infection in subjects born before 1963. 34 Here, we observed that 81% of our subjects were seropositive for measles serum antibodies, with all but three subjects exhibiting a response above background (limit of detection). Of those, two subjects (Subject 3 and 10) are currently on active treatment with bcl-2 inhibitor and BTKi respectively and one subject is treatment naïve.…”
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is predominantly a B-lymphocyte leukemia associated with immune defects that are often exacerbated by CLL directed therapies. SARS-CoV-2 infection poses a significant risk of illness or mortality to CLL patients, and while SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are highly effective in immunocompetent individuals, efficacy varies substantially in immunocompromised patients, including those with CLL. To date, studies of COVID-19 vaccine immune responses in immunocompromised hosts have largely relied on semi-quantitative antibody titers that only partially characterize vaccine-elicited immune responses and do not measure B or T-cell specific responses that may also play a protective role in vaccinees. Here, we report RBD-specific antibody as well as B-cell and T-cell responses in an observational cohort of sixteen CLL subjects who received mRNA vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, finding a strong association between CLL treatment and vaccine immunogenicity, with important implications for vaccination timing in the context of CLL treatment or recovery from prior treatment.
“…Twenty‐five percent of cancer patients lack protective antibodies for measles and 38% lack antibodies for mumps; furthermore, hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is associated with 50% lower seroprevalence compared with cancer patients with no previous HCT 1 . The reported probability for being seronegative for measles, mumps, and rubella at 5 years after allogeneic HCT are 60, 73, and 52%, respectively; 2 and prior studies suggest that virus‐specific long‐term B‐cell memory function is not maintained, regardless of the immune status of the donor 2 …”
Background
The optimal number of doses as well as the role for measurement of postvaccination titers after measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccination in adult hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients remains unknown.
Methods
In the present study, we assessed humoral immunity against measles, mumps and rubella before and after MMR vaccination in 187 adults who received at least one dose of the MMR vaccine after HCT.
Results
Among those with baseline titers, posttransplant prevaccination seroprotection rates were 56%, 30%, and 54% for measles, mumps, and rubella, respectively; and significantly lower in allogeneic versus autologous HCT recipients for measles (39% vs. 80%, p = .0001), mumps (22% vs. 41%; p = .02) and rubella (48% vs. 62%, p = .12). Among those who were seronegative at baseline, seroconversion rates after one dose of MMR were 69%, 56%, and 97% for measles, mumps, and rubella, respectively. Seronegative patients after one dose of MMR (i.e., nonresponders) seroconverted for measles and mumps after a second MMR vaccine dose.
Conclusion
Our findings demonstrate successful restoration of protective immunity against measles, mumps, and rubella after vaccination in adult HCT recipients; one dose of MMR elicited protective titers in the majority of patients, and a second vaccine dose was immunogenic in nonresponders.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.