2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2017.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seroprevalence of Fasciola hepatica in cattle in Estonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There is limited published research on the serological diagnosis of fasciolosis in cattle. The previous studies have reported fasciolosis seroprevalence rates of 56% in Uruguay [30], 5.9% in Estonia [31], 9% in Iran [32], and 63.56% in Mexico [9], which are lower than those found in the municipalities evaluated in the present study. However, Alba et al [5] indicated that 90% of the cattle evaluated in Corsica (France) were positive for anti-F. hepatica antibodies, showing a wide distribution of the parasite in the area.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…There is limited published research on the serological diagnosis of fasciolosis in cattle. The previous studies have reported fasciolosis seroprevalence rates of 56% in Uruguay [30], 5.9% in Estonia [31], 9% in Iran [32], and 63.56% in Mexico [9], which are lower than those found in the municipalities evaluated in the present study. However, Alba et al [5] indicated that 90% of the cattle evaluated in Corsica (France) were positive for anti-F. hepatica antibodies, showing a wide distribution of the parasite in the area.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Compared to what has been reported in studies in several other North European countries, the prevalence of F. hepatica in Finland remains low. The apparent herd-level prevalence of antibodies against F. hepatica of 0.45% in Finnish dairy herds is lower than the 7–25% reported in Sweden [ 22 , 23 ], 50% in Denmark [ 26 ] and 20% in Estonia [ 24 ]. In beef cattle herds, the seroprevalence in Finland was 0.97%, which is also low compared to 10% reported in Swedish [ 34 ] and 36% in Estonian beef cattle herds [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The apparent herd-level prevalence of antibodies against F. hepatica of 0.45% in Finnish dairy herds is lower than the 7–25% reported in Sweden [ 22 , 23 ], 50% in Denmark [ 26 ] and 20% in Estonia [ 24 ]. In beef cattle herds, the seroprevalence in Finland was 0.97%, which is also low compared to 10% reported in Swedish [ 34 ] and 36% in Estonian beef cattle herds [ 24 ]. However, the study design, applied ELISA method and definition of a positive herd differ between the studies, making it challenging to compare the results directly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Natomiast w badaniach bezpośrednich prewalencję szacuje się w przedziale od 0,67% do 1,43% (3,24). W krajach nadbałtyckich -w Estonii -wykazano prewalencję fascjolozy na poziomie 5,9% bydła w 28% stad (19). Powyższe dane wskazują, że inwazja motylicy wątrobowej na nowo staje się znaczącym problemem u bydła wypasanego na pastwiskach, w wielu krajach naszej strefy klimatycznej.…”
Section: Ryc 3 Prewalencja Inwazji Pasożytów Wewnętrznych Bydła W Zunclassified
“…Petersom i wsp. wykazał statystycznie wyższą prewalencję inwazji F. hepatica w Estonii w stosunku do bydła mlecznego (19). Wyższą prewalencję inwazji pasożytów wewnętrznych w dużych stadach utrzymywanych pastwiskowo potwierdzono również u innych gatunków zwierząt.…”
Section: Ryc 3 Prewalencja Inwazji Pasożytów Wewnętrznych Bydła W Zunclassified