2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.08.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seronegative neurobrucellosis—do we need new neurobrucellosis criteria?

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diagnosis of neurobrucellosis among laboratory-confirmed cases of brucellosis is confirmed by isolation of brucella from CSF and/or positive anti-Brucella antibodies in CSF [ 14 ]. However, diagnosis can be challenging, since serological testing can sometimes yield negative results [ 15 ] and the sensitivity of culture-based methods varies depending on laboratory techniques and quantity of bacteria in the CSF [ 16 ]. Other diagnostic methods such as CSF metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and 16 s rRNA sequencing technique are also used in diagnosing neurobrucellosis [ 17 ]; however, they are rarely available in the endemic areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis of neurobrucellosis among laboratory-confirmed cases of brucellosis is confirmed by isolation of brucella from CSF and/or positive anti-Brucella antibodies in CSF [ 14 ]. However, diagnosis can be challenging, since serological testing can sometimes yield negative results [ 15 ] and the sensitivity of culture-based methods varies depending on laboratory techniques and quantity of bacteria in the CSF [ 16 ]. Other diagnostic methods such as CSF metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and 16 s rRNA sequencing technique are also used in diagnosing neurobrucellosis [ 17 ]; however, they are rarely available in the endemic areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis of brucellosis can be challenging due to its nonspecific symptoms and wide presentations. In addition, serological testing can sometimes yield negative results [ 13 ]. Neurobrucellosis is diagnosed when any one of the following criteria is met.…”
Section: Clinical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive culture of Brucella in blood or cerebrospinal fluid serves as the “gold standard” for diagnosing NB ( Shakir et al., 1987 ). NB cerebrospinal fluid typically exhibits elevated protein levels, increased white blood cell count (predominantly lymphocytes), and decreased levels of glucose and chloride ( Zheng et al., 2018 ), and serological tests have a positive rate of only 28% ( Guven et al., 2013 ), cannot differentiate between current and previous infections, and consequently tend to produce false positive results ( Papadopoulos et al., 2021 ), thereby limiting their broad utilization. Relying solely on laboratory results is insufficient for an accurate diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NB is a rare but potentially fatal complication of brucellosis. It is essential to identify an efficient diagnostic test that can facilitate doctors to diagnose and treat patients with negative serum or cerebrospinal fluid to prevent severe outcomes ( Papadopoulos et al., 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussmentioning
confidence: 99%