2003
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.41.8.3973-3977.2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seronegative Bacteremic Melioidosis Caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei with Ambiguous Biochemical Profile: Clinical Importance of Accurate Identification by 16S rRNA Gene and groEL Gene Sequencing

Abstract: An aerobic gram-negative bacterium was isolated from the blood and sputum of an 84-year-old, chair-bound nursing home resident with acute bacteremic pneumonia. Although the phenotypic characteristics suggested that the bacterium could be Burkholderia pseudomallei, the Vitek 1 system (GNI؉), which can successfully identify 99% of B. pseudomallei strains, showed that the bacterium was "unidentified." Immunoglobulin G against the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of B. pseudomallei, as detected by an LPS-based enzyme-link… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sequencing of the groEL gene may also be useful but may not reliably differentiate B. mallei from B. pseudomallei (484,485).…”
Section: Diagnosis and Management Of Melioidosis Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequencing of the groEL gene may also be useful but may not reliably differentiate B. mallei from B. pseudomallei (484,485).…”
Section: Diagnosis and Management Of Melioidosis Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate identification of B. pseudomallei is important, since treatment of melioidosis requires prolonged antibiotics to prevent relapse (9). Although B. pseudomallei differs greatly from other Burkholderia species in pathogenicity and epidemiology, identification of B. pseudomallei is often difficult, as phenotypic tests and even 16S rRNA gene sequencing may not offer adequate discrimination from related species, such as B. thailandensis and B. cepacia complex (BCC) (3)(4)(5)(6)8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although coinfection by the B. cepacia complex and B. pseudomallei in cystic fibrosis patients has been reported (31), commercial systems often fail to distinguish between the two organisms (14,24,43). Since the treatment of B. pseudomallei infection requires a prolonged course of antibiotics (46), this can directly affect management, as inadequate treatment is associated with a high rate of relapse (12). Moreover, misidentification is a significant health risk to the microbiological laboratory personnel (33), as laboratory-acquired melioidosis following exposure from antimicrobial susceptibility testing on a misidentified B. cepacia complex isolate has been reported (35).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%