2012
DOI: 10.1136/vr.100490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serology and PCR for bovine leptospirosis: herd and individual approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(22 reference statements)
3
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2) demonstrated that out of 89 seropositive cows, 23 responded positively in PCR, whereas Leptospira were found only in 11 urine samples. Similar studies were conducted by many researchers (20), who observed negative reaction in bacteriological studies, but positive in 50% cases using PCR (13). In the studies of these authors, PCR demonstrated very good results as compared to traditional methods, which was also confirmed in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…2) demonstrated that out of 89 seropositive cows, 23 responded positively in PCR, whereas Leptospira were found only in 11 urine samples. Similar studies were conducted by many researchers (20), who observed negative reaction in bacteriological studies, but positive in 50% cases using PCR (13). In the studies of these authors, PCR demonstrated very good results as compared to traditional methods, which was also confirmed in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Among other species and approaches, since the 1990’s it has been studied rats ( Rattus norvegicus ) captured from an urban area [17] and dogs with clinical indications of the disease [8,18]. In relation to livestock, it was studied cows [9,19,20], horses [21-23], goats [4,24], sheep [4] and pigs [25]. Wild mammals kept in the local zoo were also studied [26], as well as golden-lion tamarins from a research center [27] and wild felines [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported that, although serology is useful for herd diagnosis, it is not adequate for detection of individual carriers (Gamage et al, 2012;Hamond et al, 2014;Otaka et al, 2012) since seronegative animals also can shed leptospires. Therefore, an identification of carrier animals by direct tests like PCR or culture is more useful (Bomfim et al, 2008;Gamage et al, 2012 et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%