The Plant Viruses 1988
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-7038-3_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serology and Immunochemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 223 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of such observations it has been suggested that unless considerable caution is used in the interpretation of serological data, serology may be a misleading approach for tracing relationships among potyviruses [29,71]. Various explanations have been proposed to account for the complex nature of the serological relationships among potyviruses [30,55]. Use of antisera of widely different titres, different assay techniques and conditions, use of only one or few antisera instead of many bleedings from the same animal and partial proteolytic in situ degradation of the coat proteins are some of the factors suggested to be responsible for the contradictory results in the serology of potyviruses [30,55].…”
Section: Classical Serologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the basis of such observations it has been suggested that unless considerable caution is used in the interpretation of serological data, serology may be a misleading approach for tracing relationships among potyviruses [29,71]. Various explanations have been proposed to account for the complex nature of the serological relationships among potyviruses [30,55]. Use of antisera of widely different titres, different assay techniques and conditions, use of only one or few antisera instead of many bleedings from the same animal and partial proteolytic in situ degradation of the coat proteins are some of the factors suggested to be responsible for the contradictory results in the serology of potyviruses [30,55].…”
Section: Classical Serologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various explanations have been proposed to account for the complex nature of the serological relationships among potyviruses [30,55]. Use of antisera of widely different titres, different assay techniques and conditions, use of only one or few antisera instead of many bleedings from the same animal and partial proteolytic in situ degradation of the coat proteins are some of the factors suggested to be responsible for the contradictory results in the serology of potyviruses [30,55]. However, we believe that the complexity" in serology of potyviruses can only be resolved by a thorough understanding of the variation in coat protein structure within the potyvirus group [82,83,89,90,92,93].…”
Section: Classical Serologymentioning
confidence: 99%