1982
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1135(82)90028-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serological response of cattle after vaccination and challenge with Brucella abortus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Any female calf vaccinated 30 to 50 days before the sampling date with the commercial brucellosis vaccine approved by SENASA (2 ml-dose) was expected to react positively to the DT (DT+ = Buffered Plate Antigen Test + and/or Complement Fixation Test +) [ 7 , 8 ]. We classified a farm as “well vaccinated” if the proportion of DT+ was not significantly lower than the ideal 95%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any female calf vaccinated 30 to 50 days before the sampling date with the commercial brucellosis vaccine approved by SENASA (2 ml-dose) was expected to react positively to the DT (DT+ = Buffered Plate Antigen Test + and/or Complement Fixation Test +) [ 7 , 8 ]. We classified a farm as “well vaccinated” if the proportion of DT+ was not significantly lower than the ideal 95%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Além disso, apresenta um relevante histórico de serviços prestados no combate à brucelose animal, uma vez que a maioria dos países desenvolvidos que conseguiram erradicar a brucelose atingiram esse êxito usando a reação de fixação de complemento como prova confirmatória. Certamente contribuiu para isso o fato de a prova apresentar boa correlação com o isolamento de Brucella abortus de bovinos infectados (Hayes & Chappel 1982, Sutherland et al 1982, Corner et al 1983.…”
Section: Introdução Introdução Introdução Introdução Introduçãounclassified
“…Second, some infected cattle may show aberrant serological reactions and are not detected (7,15). Third, maternally infected cattle may be difficult to differentiate from those recently vaccinated with either of the above vaccines (8,16). Finally, there are variations in the test due to differences in technique (1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%