2019
DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2019.126-130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serological profiling of rabies antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and its comparative analysis with rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test in mouse model

Abstract: Aim: In this study, we have used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as an alternative test to replace the cumbersome rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT) to ascertain the immune status of immunized mice against rabies virus. Materials and Methods: Rabies is a devastating disease worldwide caused by rabies virus. Proper usage of pre- or post-exposure rabies vaccine can prevent the disease transmission. In this study, mice were immunized with Vero cell-adapted inactivated rabies vaccine. RFFIT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diagnostic parameters and statistical analyses showed a high agreement between the results of iELISA and RFFIT. A similar observation has been made by other researchers for ELISA with post-vaccinal human sera [ 27 ] and random samples from different breeds in India [ 28 ], as well as for human and murine sera [ 29 , 30 , 31 ]. No significant difference was also reported while investigating two commercially available anti-rabies vaccines in a five-dose vaccination regimen in apparently healthy street dogs [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Diagnostic parameters and statistical analyses showed a high agreement between the results of iELISA and RFFIT. A similar observation has been made by other researchers for ELISA with post-vaccinal human sera [ 27 ] and random samples from different breeds in India [ 28 ], as well as for human and murine sera [ 29 , 30 , 31 ]. No significant difference was also reported while investigating two commercially available anti-rabies vaccines in a five-dose vaccination regimen in apparently healthy street dogs [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Even though the RFFIT is known to be the most reliable test for the evaluation of successful vaccination, unfortunately, this is time-consuming, expensive, and requires a live rabies virus; sometimes, the results cannot be read of due to the cytotoxic efect on the cells [10,11]. Virus neutralization technically requires highly skilled technicians, hard to standardize, sufers from some interlaboratory variations, difcult to perform at weekly intervals, and requires containment facilities, which is only conveniently carried out in reference laboratories [10,[12][13][14]. In order to overcome this, ELISA deserves to be developed as an alternative to RFFIT [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on several studies conducted in different countries, R. norvegicus represent a reservoir for Leptospira spp. Moreover, it is predicted that these rodents carry other microorganisms such as Vibrio vulnificus (V. vulnificus) and Rabies virus (3,8,9). Despite the existence of an effective vaccine regimen, the rabies virus continues to be a global health concern with an estimated human death rate Copyright © 2021, Author(s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%