2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cimid.2020.101486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serological evidence of Leptospira sp. in humans from Fernando de Noronha Island, Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in humans herein could be attributed to different factors. Firstly, the present study voluntarily recruited healthy participants, corroborating the results of surveys conducted in similar isolated human communities, such as Fernando de Noronha's Oceanic Island [25] and the metropolitan areas of southern Brazil [26], with seropositivity of 1.17% and 1.84% for healthy owners, respectively. Secondly, the study confirmed the low likelihood of leptospirosis exposure when engaged in human occupational activities on environmentally protected islands, including forbidden livestock raising, slaughter, and wildlife hunting [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…in humans herein could be attributed to different factors. Firstly, the present study voluntarily recruited healthy participants, corroborating the results of surveys conducted in similar isolated human communities, such as Fernando de Noronha's Oceanic Island [25] and the metropolitan areas of southern Brazil [26], with seropositivity of 1.17% and 1.84% for healthy owners, respectively. Secondly, the study confirmed the low likelihood of leptospirosis exposure when engaged in human occupational activities on environmentally protected islands, including forbidden livestock raising, slaughter, and wildlife hunting [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…as a common pathogen causing acute febrile illness reported in 5 of 17 studies evaluating 13,539 people [ 2 ]. In Brazil, based on a microscopic agglutination test the prevalence of anti-Leptospira antibodies was 1.17% (4/341; CI 0.46-2.98%) [ 38 ]. The present work identifies Leptospira spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples with titers ≥ 1:50 were considered as past infection, while a titer of 1:400 or higher was used to define recent infection. This cut-off point has been used in other seroprevalence studies 37 , 45 , 46 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%