2018
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.25355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serological evidence of human infection by bat orthoreovirus in Singapore

Abstract: To determine whether Pteropine orthoreovirus (PRV) exposure has occurred in Singapore, we tested 856 individuals from an existing serum panel collected from 2005‐2013. After an initial screen with luciferase immunoprecipitation system and secondary confirmation with virus neutralization test, we identified at least seven individuals with specific antibodies against PRV in both assays. Our findings confirm that PRV spillover into human populations is relatively common in this region of the world.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(28 reference statements)
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified 67 out of 517 (12.9%) macaques that were seropositive for PRV, and of these monkeys 34 out of 517 (6.57%) had neutralizing antibodies specifically against PRV3M. This is a significant finding in the context of our recently published study indicating human exposure to PRVs in Singapore [9]. For the first time, we have demonstrated evidence of exposure to PRVs in both human and monkey populations co-residing in the same city/region in close proximity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We identified 67 out of 517 (12.9%) macaques that were seropositive for PRV, and of these monkeys 34 out of 517 (6.57%) had neutralizing antibodies specifically against PRV3M. This is a significant finding in the context of our recently published study indicating human exposure to PRVs in Singapore [9]. For the first time, we have demonstrated evidence of exposure to PRVs in both human and monkey populations co-residing in the same city/region in close proximity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…It is important to note that, almost in all of the cases, an intermediate host has been identified to play a crucial role in amplifying and transmitting the virus from bats to humans such as horses for Hendra virus, pigs for Nipah virus and palm civets for SARS-CoV [25][26][27][28][29]. With multiple reports of PRV presence in bats in many parts of Asia [2,12,[14][15][16][17] and a higher than expected prevalence in certain human populations [7][8][9], we raised the hypothesis that it is possible that a yet-to-be-identified intermediate host(s) may also play a role in the spillover of PRVs from bats to humans. Alternatively, an additional reservoir may play a role in zoonotic transmission of PRV, as is the case with camels and MERS-CoV [30][31][32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…72 ). In several other cases, bat-to-human spillover was assessed retrospectively via serological human cohort studies; for example, Henipavirus spillover among bat hunters in Cameroon 73 , bat-borne reovirus (Melaka virus and Pulau virus) exposure in people living in close proximity to bat roosts on Tioman Island, Malaysia 74 , as well as in a random sample screened in Singapore 75 , Filovirus exposure of bat hunters in India 76 and ongoing human exposure to SARSr-CoVs in rural communities in China occurring after the 2003 SARS outbreak 77 .…”
Section: Viral Spillover From Batsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other related strain, WIV5, was isolated from a bat in 2011 in China 13 . Bats are natural reservoirs of a variety of viruses, including reoviruses, and accumulating evidence indicates that the interspecies transmission of other orthoreovirus species from bats to humans seems to be frequent [15][16][17][18] . Therefore, the ancestral strain of the MRV-2 Osaka strain may have originated in bats, and subsequently retained in human population for a long time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%