2012
DOI: 10.5501/wjv.v1.i1.31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serological diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infection: Problems and solutions

Abstract: Serological tests for antibodies specific for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antigens are frequently used to define infection status and for the differential diagnosis of other pathogens responsible for mononucleosis syndrome. Using only three parameters [viral capsid antigen (VCA) IgG, VCA IgM and EBV nuclear antigen (EBNA)-1 IgG],it is normally possible to distinguish acute from past infection: the presence of VCA IgM and VCA IgG without EBNA-1 IgG indicates acute infection, whereas the presence of VCA IgG and EBN… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
272
1
16

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
5
272
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned previously, we did not analyze EBNA‐1 seropositivity because the manufacturing source of the antigen changed during the study and the results were not consistent. While antibody responses against VCA are universally present in EBV exposed persons, EBNA‐1 IgG is not produced in about 5% of patients after EBV infection and in some individuals, it may disappear over time 28. Hence, the anti‐VCA IgG is a more reliable indicator of previous EBV exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned previously, we did not analyze EBNA‐1 seropositivity because the manufacturing source of the antigen changed during the study and the results were not consistent. While antibody responses against VCA are universally present in EBV exposed persons, EBNA‐1 IgG is not produced in about 5% of patients after EBV infection and in some individuals, it may disappear over time 28. Hence, the anti‐VCA IgG is a more reliable indicator of previous EBV exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of anti-EBV IgM signifies an acute infection or a reactivation of the virus (De Paschale and Clerici, 2012;Nystad and Myrmel, 2007). Since we tested for IgM in young infants, it was very likely that a positive IgM was the result of an acute infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), a member of the Herpesviridae family, is a major cause of infectious mononucleosis in young children and adolescents (De Paschale and Clerici, 2012). More than 90% of the adult population worldwide has antibodies against EBV (Hsu and Glaser, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the sensitivity of heterophile antibody test is 96-100 %, the patient's negative heterophile test makes the diagnosis of EBV unlikely, but does not exclude it. 6 Specific EBV serologies are indicated when there is a clinical suspicion for EBV infection but heterophile antibody testing is negative, as in this case. 6 Current EBV serologic testing is based on assaying for three different parameters to distinguish acute from prior infection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…6 Specific EBV serologies are indicated when there is a clinical suspicion for EBV infection but heterophile antibody testing is negative, as in this case. 6 Current EBV serologic testing is based on assaying for three different parameters to distinguish acute from prior infection. These include viral capsid IgM (VCAM), viral capsid IgG (VCAG) and nuclear antibody (VNAB).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%