1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf01315598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serological diagnosis of acute viral hepatitis

Abstract: Fifty cases of symptomatic acute viral hepatitis presenting at the Washington, D.C., Veterans Administration Medical Center between 1976 and 1978 were tested for serological markers of hepatitis virus infection. The etiology of the acute hepatitis appeared to be hepatitis A virus in 20%, hepatitis B virus in 52%, non-A, non-B agents in 22%, delta hepatitis in 4%, and infectious mononucleosis in 2%. The diagnosis of type B hepatitis was difficult to verify because 10% of cases were seronegative for HBsAg and an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
16
0
10

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…These assays use either monoclonal or polyclonal anti-HBs bound to a solid phase and a second labeled anti-HBs to detect the captured antigen. Despite the high performance of screening assays, transfusion-associated HBV infection is still reported (13,14,18). There are three possibilities to explain false-negative results in commercial assays.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These assays use either monoclonal or polyclonal anti-HBs bound to a solid phase and a second labeled anti-HBs to detect the captured antigen. Despite the high performance of screening assays, transfusion-associated HBV infection is still reported (13,14,18). There are three possibilities to explain false-negative results in commercial assays.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The progression to chronicity and complication is directly related to high viral replication demonstrable serologically by the presence of markers of pathogenicity and infectivity [11]. These serological markers include Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), HB anticore antibody (anti HBcIgM and HBcIgG), Hepatitis e antigen (HBeAg), antihepatitis e antibody (anti HBeAb), and HBV DNA [12]). Hepatitis B 'e' antigen reflects high viral replication and infectivity [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hepatitis-B-Virus (HBV) infection elicits a prominent immune response against hepatitis-Bcore-antigen (HBcAg) [1][2][3][4][5]: IgG-antibodies against HBcAg (anti-HBc) persist lifelong in HBV exposed individuals whereas IgM-antibodies decline becoming undetectable after recovery from hepatitis-B [4,[6][7][8]. Commercial assays for IgM-anti-HBc are proposed for diagnosis of acute-hepatitis-B (AHB) that is based on a clinically standardized threshold of 600 Paul-Ehrlich (PEI) [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commercial assays for IgM-anti-HBc are proposed for diagnosis of acute-hepatitis-B (AHB) that is based on a clinically standardized threshold of 600 Paul-Ehrlich (PEI) [6][7][8][9]. Using the analytical sensitivity cut-off of the assays low levels of IgM-antiHBc were found to fluctuate in chronic-hepatitis-B (CHB) paralleling the disease remission and reactivation phases [10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%