1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(96)01252-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serological analysis of feline calicivirus isolates from the United States and United Kingdom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

5
41
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the neutralization profile of fresh FCV isolates in 1970s to 1980s when the vaccine was not yet introduced is uncertain, the present results suggest a vaccine adopting a novel antigenic FCV such as 255 strain may give animals more efficient immune protection than the existing F9 type vaccine for instance. In all cases, the epidemiological feature of URI revealed here is similar to those previously described in the Western countries [2,3,9,13,15,20], especially in Britain where the majority of the vaccines incorporate F9 or F9-like strain of FCV have been used [2,3,9,13]. It has been possibly concluded based on these observations that a change in the antigenicity of FCV over the past two decades resulted from either a natural selection or the widespread use of vaccines derived predominantly from a single strain, thus leading to low efficacy of the habitual vaccine [1,4,27].…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Although the neutralization profile of fresh FCV isolates in 1970s to 1980s when the vaccine was not yet introduced is uncertain, the present results suggest a vaccine adopting a novel antigenic FCV such as 255 strain may give animals more efficient immune protection than the existing F9 type vaccine for instance. In all cases, the epidemiological feature of URI revealed here is similar to those previously described in the Western countries [2,3,9,13,15,20], especially in Britain where the majority of the vaccines incorporate F9 or F9-like strain of FCV have been used [2,3,9,13]. It has been possibly concluded based on these observations that a change in the antigenicity of FCV over the past two decades resulted from either a natural selection or the widespread use of vaccines derived predominantly from a single strain, thus leading to low efficacy of the habitual vaccine [1,4,27].…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Firstly, it will be important to increase the cross-reactivity of vaccines to maximise the chances of cross-protection, minimise the number of vaccine breakdowns, and minimise the possibilities of evolving vaccine resistant strains [56]. This approach will hopefully help with the control of both typical and more virulent forms of disease.…”
Section: Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1990s, however, some studies have shown that the rate of FCV isolation from oropharyngeal swabs of cats with upper respiratory disease is higher than that of feline herpes virus (FHV) [1,5]. It has also been reported that some FCV isolates, which are more resistant to FCV-F9 antibody, are increasing, suggesting the need for re-examination of the efficacy of the existing vaccines [1,6,7]. The most desirable method of evaluating the efficacy of the commercially available vaccines for FCV isolates is to challenge the cats immunized by injection of the vaccines to each isolate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%