2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2016.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serologic evidence of exposure to influenza D virus among persons with occupational contact with cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
129
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
129
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Inclusion of IDV into commercial BRD vaccines may improve their efficacy in preventing BRD. While several studies have failed to find evidence of widespread IDV infections in humans (Hause et al, 2013;Smith et al, 2016), a recent study found that 97% of humans occupationally exposed to cattle were serologically positive to IDV by microneutralization in contrast to 18% of non-exposed humans (White et al, 2016). While it is unknown whether infection of humans with IDV causes disease, vaccination of cattle could help limit zoonosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inclusion of IDV into commercial BRD vaccines may improve their efficacy in preventing BRD. While several studies have failed to find evidence of widespread IDV infections in humans (Hause et al, 2013;Smith et al, 2016), a recent study found that 97% of humans occupationally exposed to cattle were serologically positive to IDV by microneutralization in contrast to 18% of non-exposed humans (White et al, 2016). While it is unknown whether infection of humans with IDV causes disease, vaccination of cattle could help limit zoonosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serologic assays in two independent studies showed that IDV could potentially infect humans, although seropositivity rates in the studies differed. One of the studies reported 91% seropositivity among 35 persons working with cattle (White et al, 2016), and the other reported only 1% seropositivity among 741 persons with suspected high exposure to IDV (Eckard, 2016). Nevertheless, epidemiologic, serologic, and pathologic studies have suggested cattle are the primary natural reservoir for IDV (Collin et al, 2015; Ducatez et al, 2015; Ferguson et al, 2015; Ferguson et al, 2016; Hause et al, 2014; Jiang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this day, it was found in swine but more frequently in cattle showing mild respiratory disease suggesting cattle may be the domestic reservoir species for IDV . No human cases were discovered thus far though antibodies for IDV were found in people with close contact to cattle and swine, and in vitro studies demonstrated the ability of the virus to grow in human‐derived cells …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the wake of the H1N1pdm/2009 human pandemic, European surveillance projects for swine IAV revealed that four main IAV lineages were in circulation in domestic swine populations in Europe, one of which was of avian and three of human origin . Very little is known concerning the occurrence of IBV, ICV and IDV in European swine populations and other animal hosts . In the light of the fact that most of the porcine IAV strains established in swine are of human origin, it is conceivable that this could also be possible for human IBV and ICV .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%