2019
DOI: 10.29261/pakvetj/2019.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sero-Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Q Fever in Cattle and Buffaloes Managed at Institutional Dairy Farms

Abstract: The present study was conducted to determine the sero-prevalence of Q fever and associated risk factors in institutional dairy farms in Punjab, Pakistan. A total 11 dairy farms were investigated from different areas of Punjab province. Out of these farms, a total of 827 animals (cows n=419 and buffaloes n=408) were investigated. Presence of anti-Coxiella burnetii antibodies was determined by indirect ELISA. The overall prevalence in dairy animals (cattle and buffaloes) was 6.1% (95% CI: 4.5-7.9). In cattle pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On a global scale a slightly lower seroprevalence in cattle has been reported (20%) 12 , though with figures varying widely between countries and being higher than recorded in the current work in many cases (24% in Canada, 39% in the Netherlands, 40% in Germany, 46% in Japan and 82% in the USA) 73 – 76 . Lower seroprevalence among Pakistan’s cattle and buffaloes is suggested in a 2019 study by Rashid et al, with only 6.1% of animals testing positive for Q fever across 11 dairy farms 77 . This notably low figure probably resulted from this work only encompassing institutional holdings (managed by government authorities), where animal management would have been delivered by qualified veterinarians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…On a global scale a slightly lower seroprevalence in cattle has been reported (20%) 12 , though with figures varying widely between countries and being higher than recorded in the current work in many cases (24% in Canada, 39% in the Netherlands, 40% in Germany, 46% in Japan and 82% in the USA) 73 – 76 . Lower seroprevalence among Pakistan’s cattle and buffaloes is suggested in a 2019 study by Rashid et al, with only 6.1% of animals testing positive for Q fever across 11 dairy farms 77 . This notably low figure probably resulted from this work only encompassing institutional holdings (managed by government authorities), where animal management would have been delivered by qualified veterinarians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Ticks have been found notorious for their sustainable distribution in various agro-geo climates of Pakistan over the last decade (Sajid, et al, 2007;2009;2017;Karim et al, 2017;Sajid et al, 2018;Hassan et al, 2018;Rashid et al, 2019;). The probable reasons of higher threat of ticks and tickborne diseases in developing countries (including Pakistan) may include but are not limited to warmer seasons and higher average temperatures, which promote the growth and propagation of ticks (Soulsby, 1982;Patel et al, 2013;Rizwan et al, 2019), the lack of appropriate husbandry practices i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ticks have been well-documented from almost all regions of Pakistan including Sindh (Soomro et al, 2014), Khyber Pakhtunkwa (KPK) (Ali et al, 2019), Balochistan (Kakar et al, 2017), Punjab (Sajid et al, 2008;2009; and northern areas of Pakistan including Gilgit-Baltistan (Sajid et al, 2017). Many risk factors are associated with tick infestation in farm animals which have a direct impact on the epidemiology of tick-borne diseases (Karim et al, 2017;Sajid et al, 2018;Hassan et al, 2018;Rashid et al, 2019;Rizwan et al, 2019) Small ruminant population particularly goats (called as the poor man's cow) contribute a major share in the livestock population of the country (Afzal and Naqvi, 2003). However, in spite of immense significance of goats in the livestock economy of Pakistan, along with other animal health issues, information regarding the ticks and tick-borne disease dynamics in nomadic and settled farming systems and trends of the small holder goat farming community/ nomads about tick management in the country is lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, 11 institutional livestock farms (Farms A-K), administered by the Livestock and Dairy Development (L&DD), Government of Punjab, Lahore and University of Agriculture (UAF), Faisalabad, representing different geographical locations ( Figure 1) were selected as described previously [23,24]. Since the prevalence of brucellosis was considered unknown at these selected farms, the sampling frame was constructed to investigate brucellosis at expected prevalence of 50%, 95% confidence interval (CI) and 5% desired absolute precision [25].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%