2010
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serious Overestimation in Quantitative PCR by Circular (Supercoiled) Plasmid Standard: Microalgal pcna as the Model Gene

Abstract: Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) has become a gold standard for the quantification of nucleic acids and microorganism abundances, in which plasmid DNA carrying the target genes are most commonly used as the standard. A recent study showed that supercoiled circular confirmation of DNA appeared to suppress PCR amplification. However, to what extent to which different structural types of DNA (circular versus linear) used as the standard may affect the quantification accuracy has not been evaluated. In this study… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
177
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
177
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average r 2 value for all reaction runs was 0.98 for both targets, with average reaction efficiencies of 83% and 81% for HF183 and HPyVs, respectively. These relatively low efficiency values likely resulted from use of circular rather than linear plasmid DNA, as has been previously suggested (23). Inhibition control.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The average r 2 value for all reaction runs was 0.98 for both targets, with average reaction efficiencies of 83% and 81% for HF183 and HPyVs, respectively. These relatively low efficiency values likely resulted from use of circular rather than linear plasmid DNA, as has been previously suggested (23). Inhibition control.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Although the average amplification efficiencies were slightly lower than 90%, the differences between the efficiencies of the different absolute standards were small (ϳ1%). The parallel analysis of standards allowed us to calculate the difference in ITS2 copy numbers per zoospore determined from an uncut (circular) versus a cut (linearized) plasmid standard, known to show discrepancies in eukaryotic cells (33). Analysis of the circular plasmid overestimated the values compared to analysis of the linearized plasmid, where the circular plasmid C T values were an average of 5.76 Ϯ 0.72 (mean Ϯ standard deviation) higher than the linearized plasmid values for the same DNA concentration (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All qPCR assays included negative controls without template, as well as reactions containing between 10 1 and 10 9 DNA copies to generate standard curves and calculate amplification efficiencies according to the equation: E = 10 [−1/slope] (Pfaffl, 2001). DNA standards consisted of linearized plasmids carrying the appropriate target gene (Hou et al, 2010), which were sequenced to confirm their identity and primer binding site. Each assay was performed in triplicate, with triplicate measurements for each sample.…”
Section: Quantitative Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (Qpcr) Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%