2004
DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2004.9646402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serious Lies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical evidence supports that the most common reason for keeping secrets is being concerned about the social consequences (Afifi & Burgoon, 1998;Roesler & Wind, 1994) and the finding that perceived social disapproval significantly predicts secrecy (Major & Gramzow, 1999;Vrij, Paterson, Nunkoosing, Soukara, & Oosterwegel, 2003). Secrecy can also be used for impression management, which refers to the way people control others' perceptions of them by strategically concealing key personal information-for example, a married man who is not disclosing that he is married in order to create the impression that he is available for a serious relationship (Burgoon & Buller, 1994;DePaulo, Ansfield, Kirkendol, & Boden, 2004;Pachankis & Goldfried, 2006;Vohs, Baumeister, & Ciarocco, 2005;Woods & Harbeck, 1992).…”
Section: Secrecymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Empirical evidence supports that the most common reason for keeping secrets is being concerned about the social consequences (Afifi & Burgoon, 1998;Roesler & Wind, 1994) and the finding that perceived social disapproval significantly predicts secrecy (Major & Gramzow, 1999;Vrij, Paterson, Nunkoosing, Soukara, & Oosterwegel, 2003). Secrecy can also be used for impression management, which refers to the way people control others' perceptions of them by strategically concealing key personal information-for example, a married man who is not disclosing that he is married in order to create the impression that he is available for a serious relationship (Burgoon & Buller, 1994;DePaulo, Ansfield, Kirkendol, & Boden, 2004;Pachankis & Goldfried, 2006;Vohs, Baumeister, & Ciarocco, 2005;Woods & Harbeck, 1992).…”
Section: Secrecymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This type of lying is observable in preschool children as well as adults (Lewis, Stanger, & Sullivan, 1989;Talwar & Lee, 2002). Serious lies, which tend to be told more often in close interpersonal relationships, might be told to avoid discovery of an extramarital affair, for example (DePaulo, Ansfield, Kirkendol, & Boden, 2004). In legal and mental health contexts, such lies could be told to avoid prosecution, perhaps by malingering mental illness, or to help or hinder prosecution of another person.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This implies that we might be particularly adept at reading the mental states of familiar others (i.e., those with whom we may perceive a heightened probability of strategic alliance), particularly given that our most serious lies tend to be exchanged among those with whom we are the closest (DePaulo, Ansfield, Kirkendol, & Boden, 2004). People tend to ascribe more complex mental states to members of their own versus other social groups (Paladino et al, 2002), and same-race faces are processed more holistically (Michel, Rossion, Han, Chung, & Caldara, 2006), more deeply (Levin, 1996), and are remembered better (Meissner & Brigham, 2001) than other-race faces.…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%