The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Series solutions for flow in stratified aquifers with natural geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Flow rates are calculated as the spatial derivative of the discharge potential. In a manner similar to Wong and Craig [] for the 2‐D discharge magnitude normal to an interface, the 3‐D discharge across an interface can be decomposed into vertical and horizontal components when the cosine of the slope angle (in both x and y directions) describing each evaluation surface may be approximated as unity. The resulting equation is as follows: ϕmη=ϕmzdẑdxϕmxdẑdyϕmy where η is the coordinate normal to interface surfaces represented by the function ẑ(x,y), which is either a layer interface true(zm(x,y)true), bottom bedrock surface true(zM+1(x,y)true) or top interface true(zt(x,y)true).…”
Section: General Problem Statement and Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Flow rates are calculated as the spatial derivative of the discharge potential. In a manner similar to Wong and Craig [] for the 2‐D discharge magnitude normal to an interface, the 3‐D discharge across an interface can be decomposed into vertical and horizontal components when the cosine of the slope angle (in both x and y directions) describing each evaluation surface may be approximated as unity. The resulting equation is as follows: ϕmη=ϕmzdẑdxϕmxdẑdyϕmy where η is the coordinate normal to interface surfaces represented by the function ẑ(x,y), which is either a layer interface true(zm(x,y)true), bottom bedrock surface true(zM+1(x,y)true) or top interface true(zt(x,y)true).…”
Section: General Problem Statement and Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances in semianalytical series solution methods have relaxed the constraints on system geometry. This has been achieved by augmenting the method of separation of variables with a simple least squares numerical algorithm to develop 2‐D homogenous [e.g., Read and Volker , ; Wörman et al ., ] and multilayer [e.g., Craig , ; Wong and Craig , ] topography‐driven flow models. In the topography‐driven flow model the water table location is presumed known prior to the solution as a subdued replica of topographic surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method outlined here is quite simple in comparison; it requires no conformal mapping of the domain onto the boundary of the shape, no special far‐field expansion to account for numerical stability issues, and the functional form of the solution is simply expressed in terms of two polynomial series. The elements derive from recent success in modeling features with arbitrary geometry in finite domains using series solution approaches (Wong and Craig ; Ameli and Craig ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AEM is based on analytic solutions of the groundwater governing equations and does not depend on domain discretization, being able to tackle multiscale problems where other methods have difficulties (MARIN, 2011;STRACK, 1989). This method has been applied in different fields such as wellhead protection area delineation, nuclear waste repositories, and vertical stratified aquifers (MARIN, 2011;WONG;CRAIG, 2010). In this method, each analytic solution represents an hydrogeologic feature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%