2017
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serial Sampling of Serum Protein Biomarkers for Monitoring Human Traumatic Brain Injury Dynamics: A Systematic Review

Abstract: BackgroundThe proteins S100B, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and neurofilament light (NF-L) have been serially sampled in serum of patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI) in order to assess injury severity and tissue fate. We review the current literature of serum level dynamics of these proteins following TBI and used the term “effective half-life” (t1/2) in order to describe the “fall” rate in serum.Materia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
163
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
(630 reference statements)
15
163
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The complex and varied biogenesis underpinning the release of circulating exosomal brain injury proteins, along with their potential double-edged role in the contexts of the pathobiology of TBI [21,29], can provide a possible explanation for the observed absence of a correlation between exosomal markers, and injury severity and neurosurgical interventions. Alternatively, we cannot fully rule out an effect of variability in the time interval between blood draw and injury/procedures [30]. Future work is warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The complex and varied biogenesis underpinning the release of circulating exosomal brain injury proteins, along with their potential double-edged role in the contexts of the pathobiology of TBI [21,29], can provide a possible explanation for the observed absence of a correlation between exosomal markers, and injury severity and neurosurgical interventions. Alternatively, we cannot fully rule out an effect of variability in the time interval between blood draw and injury/procedures [30]. Future work is warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These studies suggest that GFAP serum levels are related to brain damage and cell death induced by, in, or near the tumor. This is supported by studies that have linked high GFAP serum levels in patients with traumatic brain injury (Bazarian et al, 2018;Thelin et al, 2017). Increased levels of GFAP positive microparticles can be observed from 7 days up to 7 months after surgery (Sartori et al, 2013), although another study that measured GFAP serum levels 6 weeks after surgery, does not…”
Section: Gfap As a Blood Biomarkermentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Biologically, NSE is larger (39 kDa) 71,72 than S100B (9-14 kDa), 73 implications of which could be a swifter movement across body compartments for small proteins and a longer serum half-life for larger proteins. Accordingly, NSE has been shown to exhibit an ''effective half-life'' of up to 48-72 h in serum compared with 24 h for S100B, 74 following severe TBI. This would give a slower decline of NSE blood values than S100B values.…”
Section: Bbb Disruption Predicts S100b But Not Nse Concentrations Inmentioning
confidence: 99%