2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.01.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serial hematocrit testing does not identify major injuries in trauma patients in an observation unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a retrospective study of 404 trauma patients (39 of whom required emergent hemostatic procedures), Bruns and colleagues [ 10 ] found that a Hb level ≤ 10 g/dl, measured using the HemoCue ® POC device within 30 min of the patient’s arrival at hospital, was associated with a threefold increase in the need for an emergent hemostatic procedure. Other authors found that Hb measured upon admission was not accurate in identifying major injuries [ 11 , 12 ] or the need for an emergent hemostatic intervention [ 13 , 14 ]. In the present study, Hb-Lab hosp had a strong ability to predict SH (AUC of 0.92), but this measurement is taken in the laboratory and so results are subject to a delay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a retrospective study of 404 trauma patients (39 of whom required emergent hemostatic procedures), Bruns and colleagues [ 10 ] found that a Hb level ≤ 10 g/dl, measured using the HemoCue ® POC device within 30 min of the patient’s arrival at hospital, was associated with a threefold increase in the need for an emergent hemostatic procedure. Other authors found that Hb measured upon admission was not accurate in identifying major injuries [ 11 , 12 ] or the need for an emergent hemostatic intervention [ 13 , 14 ]. In the present study, Hb-Lab hosp had a strong ability to predict SH (AUC of 0.92), but this measurement is taken in the laboratory and so results are subject to a delay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Thorson and colleagues, in a study based on chart review, found that serial measurements were a good indicator of blood loss in trauma patients who had an initial assessment within the first 30 minutes of arrival and a second assessment within four hours, 1 but the study by Madsen suggests that serial measurements taken six hours apart rarely provide diagnostic information in trauma patients who are deemed stable for placement in observation units after the initial trauma screening. 5 Given that our assessment of the utility of serial hemoglobin primarily focused on the first five minutes of arrival to the resuscitation suite, our results cannot be generalized to different interval scales for serial hemoglobin measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…4 However, recent studies on the utility of serial measurements have produced inconclusive results. 1,4,5 These differing conclusions reflect differences in methodology, study populations, and the time frame of the serial evaluations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%