2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.11.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serial Assessment of Weight-Bearing Lower Extremity Alignment Radiographs After Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, it is possible that alignment changes over time after OWHTO 28 ; however, we included cases with radiographs obtained from 6 weeks to 3 months after operation, during which time changes in alignment would be minimal. 28 Some authors reported progressive changes in alignment by evaluating serial radiographs, but the difference of alignment (weight-bearing line) was only 1.5% at 6 months after operation. 28 Third, there is little information about the effects of abnormal KJLO on knee kinematics, functional outcomes, and long-term survival 29 ; of note, the clinical scores during this short follow-up were not significantly different between the two groups with or without abnormal -post KJLO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, it is possible that alignment changes over time after OWHTO 28 ; however, we included cases with radiographs obtained from 6 weeks to 3 months after operation, during which time changes in alignment would be minimal. 28 Some authors reported progressive changes in alignment by evaluating serial radiographs, but the difference of alignment (weight-bearing line) was only 1.5% at 6 months after operation. 28 Third, there is little information about the effects of abnormal KJLO on knee kinematics, functional outcomes, and long-term survival 29 ; of note, the clinical scores during this short follow-up were not significantly different between the two groups with or without abnormal -post KJLO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Some authors reported progressive changes in alignment by evaluating serial radiographs, but the difference of alignment (weight-bearing line) was only 1.5% at 6 months after operation. 28 Third, there is little information about the effects of abnormal KJLO on knee kinematics, functional outcomes, and long-term survival 29 ; of note, the clinical scores during this short follow-up were not significantly different between the two groups with or without abnormal -post KJLO. In addition, the clinical relevance of the threshold of 4 degrees of -post KJLO was not evaluated in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight bearing line (WBL) ratio on the standing whole leg radiograph was used to determine the target amount of correction (postoperative 6 weeks) 24) . The INFINITT ver.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixth, the time point of radiographic and/or functional outcome evaluation varied among the included studies. Alignment can change over time, hence, the different follow-up period and the time point of the radiographic evaluation may affect the result 39) including the functional outcome; substantial heterogeneity of included studies is the inherent limitation of meta-analyses. Finally, the long-term result was not investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%