2013
DOI: 10.1118/1.4811129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequentially reweighted TV minimization for CT metal artifact reduction

Abstract: Purpose: Metal artifact reduction has long been an important topic in x-ray CT image reconstruction. In this work, the authors propose an iterative method that sequentially minimizes a reweighted total variation (TV) of the image and produces substantially artifact-reduced reconstructions. Methods: A sequentially reweighted TV minimization algorithm is proposed to fully exploit the sparseness of image gradients (IG). The authors first formulate a constrained optimization model that minimizes a weighted TV of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14). [66][67][68] When compared to conventional volume rendering postprocessing techniques, 69 cinematic rendering is a recently introduced 3D visualization method of volumetric CT and MRI data that applies a highly sophisticated lighting model, enabling the generation of photorealistic images resembling gross anatomical specimens (►Fig. 15).…”
Section: Three-dimensional Postprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14). [66][67][68] When compared to conventional volume rendering postprocessing techniques, 69 cinematic rendering is a recently introduced 3D visualization method of volumetric CT and MRI data that applies a highly sophisticated lighting model, enabling the generation of photorealistic images resembling gross anatomical specimens (►Fig. 15).…”
Section: Three-dimensional Postprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem has existed for many years, and various metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithms have been proposed. They can be roughly classified into sinogram in-painting methods [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], iterative methods [12][13][14][15], and hybrid methods [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iterative reconstruction [5][6][7][8][9][10] methods are less susceptible to metal artifacts, but these methods have other drawbacks due to their high computational cost. In sinogram correction methods, it is first to determine the metal-corrupted region in projection domain and then replace them with surrogate data via different interpolation techniques, such as linear interpolation [11], multi-resolution interpolation [12], prior-interpolation [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%