1989
DOI: 10.1021/ja00193a052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential solvation of atomic transition-metal ions. The second solvent molecule can bind more strongly than the first

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
153
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
21
153
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, calculated structures for the stable, hydrated hydroxyuranyl complexes do not appear to support this (vide infra). It is worthwhile noting that the relative ordering of the rate constants mirrors earlier studies of hydrate thermodynamics for first row transition metal monocations M ϩ , which showed that the bond energy for the second water molecule was Ն that of the first [43][44][45][46][47][48]; since this trend was not observed for alkali metals, it was rationalized in terms of orbital rehybridization. Since orbital rehybridization is also significant in the uranyl system [41], measurement of bond energies for the three H 2 O molecules attached to (UO 2 OH) ϩ is needed, but cannot be accomplished using the present experimental setup.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…However, calculated structures for the stable, hydrated hydroxyuranyl complexes do not appear to support this (vide infra). It is worthwhile noting that the relative ordering of the rate constants mirrors earlier studies of hydrate thermodynamics for first row transition metal monocations M ϩ , which showed that the bond energy for the second water molecule was Ն that of the first [43][44][45][46][47][48]; since this trend was not observed for alkali metals, it was rationalized in terms of orbital rehybridization. Since orbital rehybridization is also significant in the uranyl system [41], measurement of bond energies for the three H 2 O molecules attached to (UO 2 OH) ϩ is needed, but cannot be accomplished using the present experimental setup.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…A similar ordering is observed for the bond dissociation energies (BDEs) of a second water ligand, but particularly notable is that the second BDEs exceed the first BDEs in the case of Cu and Au. This phenomenon was first discovered by Marinelli and Squires in an experimental study of M(H 2 O) n + cations of 3d metals [21] and attributed to the reorganization energy which is necessary to disturb the electron configuration of the metal ion upon approach of the first ligand, whereas the second ligand enters an already disturbed arrangement [22,23]. In other words, the first ligand already pays the bill of the second [24].…”
Section: Hydrated Coinage-metal Ionsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It is well known that Cu + forms very strongly bonded dicoordinated linear complexes and that the first two bond energies Cu + L and LCu + L are approximately equal and much higher than those with additional ligands as mentioned above [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Indeed, recent experimental data for H 2 O, NH 3 , (Me) 2 O, MeCN, and acetone indicate that the second binding energy is identical to the first one [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Comparison Of Binding Energies Of Cu + Between the First Andmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In these studies, the L 2 Cu + complexes rather than LCu + were choosen owing to experimental convenience. Since the first two bond energies Cu + L and CuL + L are approximately equal and much higher than those observed with additional ligands [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], the special stability of L 2 Cu + enables the measurements of the exchange equilibria. Although these results may provide somewhat restricted information, they are very valuable because they deal with the first two strongest bonding interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%