2016
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2015.2494875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential Randomized Algorithms for Convex Optimization in the Presence of Uncertainty

Abstract: In this paper, we propose new sequential randomized algorithms for convex optimization problems in the presence of uncertainty. A rigorous analysis of the theoretical properties of the solutions obtained by these algorithms, for full constraint satisfaction and partial constraint satisfaction, respectively, is given. The proposed methods allow to enlarge the applicability of the existing randomized methods to real-world applications involving a large number of design variables. Since the proposed approach does… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
55
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach and the results in [8], however, are distinctively different from the ones proposed here. In [8], the scenario problems are solved using a number N k of scenarios that grows with the iteration count k, up to the value N plain that corresponds to the plain, one-shot, scenario design. The major shortcoming of the approach and analysis in [8] is that the number of iterations is not bounded a-priori, either in a deterministic or in a probabilistic sense, and no tradeoff curve is proposed for the choice of N k in function of the expected running time of the algorithm.…”
Section: Repetitive Scenario Designcontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The approach and the results in [8], however, are distinctively different from the ones proposed here. In [8], the scenario problems are solved using a number N k of scenarios that grows with the iteration count k, up to the value N plain that corresponds to the plain, one-shot, scenario design. The major shortcoming of the approach and analysis in [8] is that the number of iterations is not bounded a-priori, either in a deterministic or in a probabilistic sense, and no tradeoff curve is proposed for the choice of N k in function of the expected running time of the algorithm.…”
Section: Repetitive Scenario Designcontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…In [8], the scenario problems are solved using a number N k of scenarios that grows with the iteration count k, up to the value N plain that corresponds to the plain, one-shot, scenario design. The major shortcoming of the approach and analysis in [8] is that the number of iterations is not bounded a-priori, either in a deterministic or in a probabilistic sense, and no tradeoff curve is proposed for the choice of N k in function of the expected running time of the algorithm. As a result, there is no a-priori guarantee that the algorithm does not reach the final iteration, in which N k equals N plain , hence the worst-case complexity of the algorithm in [8] can be worse than the one of the plain scenario design method, and an actual reduction of the number of design samples is not theoretically guaranteed.…”
Section: Repetitive Scenario Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, in Alamo et al (2013), the general class of sequential probabilistic validation (SPV) algorithms has been introduced. A specific SPV algorithm tailored to scenario problems, providing a sequential scheme for dealing with the optimization problem, has been recently studied in Chamanbaz et al (2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along this direction, sequential randomized algorithms were developed for convex scenario optimization problems [180], and fell into the framework of Sequential Probabilistic Validation (SPV) [181]. The motivation behind these sequential algorithms is that validating a given solution with a large number of samples is less computational expensive than solving the corresponding scenario optimization problem.…”
Section: Scenario Optimization Approach For Chance Constrained Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%