Comprehensive Chemometrics 2009
DOI: 10.1016/b978-044452701-1.00036-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential Optimization Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second phase of method optimization, either sequential optimization methods, using simplex approaches [10,12], or simultaneous optimization strategies, using response-surface designs [1,2,12], are usually applied. The main difference between their applications is that for a response-surface design the experimental design domain, defined by the factor levels examined, is expected to contain the optimum, whereas a sequential optimization method can be applied in situations where the experimental region containing the optimum result is not a priori known.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the second phase of method optimization, either sequential optimization methods, using simplex approaches [10,12], or simultaneous optimization strategies, using response-surface designs [1,2,12], are usually applied. The main difference between their applications is that for a response-surface design the experimental design domain, defined by the factor levels examined, is expected to contain the optimum, whereas a sequential optimization method can be applied in situations where the experimental region containing the optimum result is not a priori known.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Univariate approaches are not further discussed in this paper. Multivariate methods can be further divided into sequential and simultaneous strategies [2,[9][10][11]. In sequential strategies a few experiments only are initially performed and the results obtained are used to define the next experiment(s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been recommended not to examine more than three factors due to the inherent high number of experiments [71]. However, considering that the chromatographic system alone could be influenced by more than 50 factors [72], then it would be interesting to investigate the performance of Doehlert uniform shell designs in the optimization of a high number of chromatographic instrumental parameters (k 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QbD has become a significant model for the pharmaceutical industries and defined in the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) regulation on pharmaceutical development as ''a systematic approach to the development that begins with predefined objectives and emphasizes product and process understanding and process control, based on sound science and quality risk management.'' [2] For method optimization, either sequential optimization methods, using simplex approaches, [3,4] or simultaneous optimization strategies, using response-surface designs, [4][5][6] are reported. The main difference between their applications is that for a response-surface design the experimental design domain, defined by the factor levels examined, is expected to contain the optimum, whereas a sequential optimization method can be applied in situations where the experimental domain containing the optimum result is not previously known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%