Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3106426.3106446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential multi-class labeling in crowdsourcing

Abstract: Abstract-We consider a crowdsourcing platform where workers' responses to questions posed by a crowdsourcer are used to determine the hidden state of a multi-class labeling problem. As workers may be unreliable, we propose to perform sequential questioning in which the questions posed to the workers are designed based on previous questions and answers. We propose a Partially-Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) framework to determine the best questioning strategy, subject to the crowdsourcer's budget con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…zn→m is the index of the community agent n subscribes to under the social influence of agent m. φ = ((φ n→m,k ) k )n,m β = (β k ) k β k is the social network parameter defined in (8).…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…zn→m is the index of the community agent n subscribes to under the social influence of agent m. φ = ((φ n→m,k ) k )n,m β = (β k ) k β k is the social network parameter defined in (8).…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work belongs to this category. In [7], [31], as workers may be unreliable, the authors proposed to perform sequential questioning in which the questions posed to the workers are designed based on previous questions and answers. Reference [32] studied sequential user selection using a Bayes update aided online solution in the problem of news disseminating.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have shown their algorithm performs well even with spammers who are unreliable workers that make decisions at random, as compared to the trivial majority voting strategy. In [7], a sequential questioning strategy is developed to accommodate and recover from errors made by the workers. In many other works [8]- [10], spammers are filtered out when assigning tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I T is common for agents in a social network to report conflicting opinions [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. Some of the agents are unreliable and maybe biased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%