1997
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/8.2.162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential mate choice by multiply mating smooth newts: females become more choosy

Abstract: In some species, females sequentially mate with different males within a single mating period, store sperm until the eggs are eventually fertilized, and gain no other resources from the males. Halliday hypothesized that, for such species, a female could ensure fertilization of her eggs by mating with the first male that she encounters; thereafter, she can maximize the quality of her progeny by sampling further males and by mating only with males of higher quality than previously mated males. This hypothesis pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
92
2
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
92
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…stage (Forsgren, 1997;Gabor and Halliday, 1997;Lynch et al, 2005;Qvarnstrom et al, 2000). For example, a study on plasticity in mating preference in Túngara frog females (Lynch et al, 2005) has shown that the probability of recognizing both a conspecific call (receptivity) and a call less attractive than a conspecific call (permissiveness) changes during the reproductive stages of females, probably because of differences in their hormonal state (Lynch et al, 2006).…”
Section: The Perceived Utility Of Prospective Mates: U = P(a|h)/p(a|hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…stage (Forsgren, 1997;Gabor and Halliday, 1997;Lynch et al, 2005;Qvarnstrom et al, 2000). For example, a study on plasticity in mating preference in Túngara frog females (Lynch et al, 2005) has shown that the probability of recognizing both a conspecific call (receptivity) and a call less attractive than a conspecific call (permissiveness) changes during the reproductive stages of females, probably because of differences in their hormonal state (Lynch et al, 2006).…”
Section: The Perceived Utility Of Prospective Mates: U = P(a|h)/p(a|hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of females to "trade-up" with regard to mate quality (Halliday 1983;Jennions and Petrie 2000) has been documented in a range of species that exhibit sequential mate choice (Bakker and Milinski 1991;Brooks and Caithness 1995;Gabor and Halliday 1997;Pitcher et al 2003), including the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (Bateman et al 2001). In T. commodus, we found no evidence that CFC depended on the relative attractiveness of previous mates.…”
Section: Episodes Of Sexual Selection In Field Cricketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crest height is condition dependent (Green 1991a;Baker 1992), and large-crested males are able to signal quality both through the height of the crest and the vigour of their courtship (Green 1991b). Large crests are favoured by females (Green 1991a;Gabor & Halliday 1997). Thus, in these two species, female choice should favour an optimal phenotype (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%