A series
of carbene–diether ligands were prepared and the
corresponding Ag salts used to prepare the complexes RuHCl(PPh3)2(Im(OR)2) (Im(OR)2 = C3H2(NCH2CH2OR)2; R = Me (4a), t-Bu (4b), tert-hexyl (4c), Ph (4d), 2,6-i-Pr2C6H3 (4e)). In an analogous fashion the species RuHCl(PPh3)2(Y2Im(OMe)2) (Y2Im(OMe)2 = Y2C3(NCH2CH2OMe)2; Y2 = C6H4 (4f), Y = Cl (4g), Me (4h)) were also synthesized. Similarly RuHCl(CO)(PPh3)2(Im(OMe)2) (5) was prepared and readily
converted to RuHCl(CO)(SIMes)(Im(OMe)2) (6) via treatment with SIMes. The reaction of 4a with
SIMes afforded RuHCl(SIMes)(Im(OMe)2)(PPh3)
(7), which reacts subsequently with Na[BPh4] to give [RuH(Im(OMe)2)(SIMes)][(η6-Ph)BPh3] (8). In a series of tests, the species 4a–h, 5, 6,
and 8 were shown to catalyze the hydrogenations of 1-hexene,
cyclohexene, and dimethyl
itaconate. From the activity of 4a–h it is clear that the capability of the carbene–ether substituents
to coordinate to the metal as well as electron-donating substituents
on the carbene fragment enhances catalytic activity. Other variations
such as in 5, 6, and 8 resulted
in terminal-olefin-selective hydrogenation catalysts, although the
zwitterionic species 8 showed significantly enhanced
activity.