Abstract:We present a new approach to test selection in sequential diagnosis (or classification) in the independence Bayesian framework that resembles the hypotheticodeductive approach to test selection used by doctors. In spite of its relative simplicity in comparison with previous models of hypothetico-deductive reasoning, the approach retains the advantage that the relevance of a selected test can be explained in strategic terms. We also examine possible approaches to the problem of deciding when there is sufficient… Show more
“…The approach is based on the usual assumptions of the independence Bayesian framework [24]. It automatically learns from the data captured in the diagnostic cycle of selecting a target drug event and hence updates the probabilities in the light of the new evidence.…”
Section: Statistical Perspectives Modeling With the Bayesian Theoremmentioning
SummaryObjectives: Knowledge sharing is crucial for better patient care in the healthcare industry, but it is challenging for physicians to exchange their clinical insights and practice experiences, particularly with regard to the issuing of prescriptions for medicine. The aim of our study is to facilitate knowledge sharing and information exchange in this area by means of a knowledge-based system.Methods: We propose a knowledge-based system, CASESIAN, to automatically model each physician's prescription experience. This is done by collecting as many as possible instances of when the physician has issued a prescription. These occasions will be analyzed from a statistical perspective to form a reciprocal interactive knowledge sharing process for the issuing of medical prescriptions which we will call the prescription process. With the help of the prescription data in medical organizations, the knowledge-based system employs the Bayesian Theorem to correlate the experience of peers in order to evaluate individual prescription knowledge as retrieved through the Case-based Reasoning technique. In addition, a system prototype was implemented in a Hong Kong medical organization to evaluate the feasibility of such an approach.Results: Our evaluation indicates that there is a significant improvement in knowledge sharing after the adoption of the system. CASESIAN obtains a higher rating in both recall and precision measurement when compared to traditional knowledge-based system. In particular, its information retrieval is much stronger than the baseline in around 40%. Furthermore, regarding the result of the interviews, physicians agree that the system can improve the storing and sharing of medical prescription knowledge.Conclusion: Compared with conventional knowledge-based systems, CASESIAN provides more peer-based evidence that can enhance the learning and sharing process, transforming it from a single loop to a double loop. The quality of shared knowledge is, in addition, more objective and less biased.
“…The approach is based on the usual assumptions of the independence Bayesian framework [24]. It automatically learns from the data captured in the diagnostic cycle of selecting a target drug event and hence updates the probabilities in the light of the new evidence.…”
Section: Statistical Perspectives Modeling With the Bayesian Theoremmentioning
SummaryObjectives: Knowledge sharing is crucial for better patient care in the healthcare industry, but it is challenging for physicians to exchange their clinical insights and practice experiences, particularly with regard to the issuing of prescriptions for medicine. The aim of our study is to facilitate knowledge sharing and information exchange in this area by means of a knowledge-based system.Methods: We propose a knowledge-based system, CASESIAN, to automatically model each physician's prescription experience. This is done by collecting as many as possible instances of when the physician has issued a prescription. These occasions will be analyzed from a statistical perspective to form a reciprocal interactive knowledge sharing process for the issuing of medical prescriptions which we will call the prescription process. With the help of the prescription data in medical organizations, the knowledge-based system employs the Bayesian Theorem to correlate the experience of peers in order to evaluate individual prescription knowledge as retrieved through the Case-based Reasoning technique. In addition, a system prototype was implemented in a Hong Kong medical organization to evaluate the feasibility of such an approach.Results: Our evaluation indicates that there is a significant improvement in knowledge sharing after the adoption of the system. CASESIAN obtains a higher rating in both recall and precision measurement when compared to traditional knowledge-based system. In particular, its information retrieval is much stronger than the baseline in around 40%. Furthermore, regarding the result of the interviews, physicians agree that the system can improve the storing and sharing of medical prescription knowledge.Conclusion: Compared with conventional knowledge-based systems, CASESIAN provides more peer-based evidence that can enhance the learning and sharing process, transforming it from a single loop to a double loop. The quality of shared knowledge is, in addition, more objective and less biased.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.