2017
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2016.2616372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential Coordination of Transmission Expansion Planning With Strategic Generation Investments

Abstract: Abstract-This paper proposes mathematical models for sequential coordination of transmission expansion planning with strategic generation investments. The proactive and reactive coordinations are modeled and studied. The interaction between transmission company (Transco) and strategic generation companies (Gencos) is modeled using the sequential-move game. This is while the interaction between the strategic Gencos is modeled as a simultaneous-move game. In the proactive coordination, the Transco expands its fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, even in this case, multiple Nash equilibria can arise. As mentioned in Section 3.1.2 no anticipation of the spot market is assumed in [15,28,41]. In [29,41], multiple equilibria are eliminated considering a pessimistic TRANSCO approach.…”
Section: Perfectly Competitive Versus Oligopolistic Geptep Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even in this case, multiple Nash equilibria can arise. As mentioned in Section 3.1.2 no anticipation of the spot market is assumed in [15,28,41]. In [29,41], multiple equilibria are eliminated considering a pessimistic TRANSCO approach.…”
Section: Perfectly Competitive Versus Oligopolistic Geptep Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed methodology in [9] is a bi-level programming model whose upper-level represents the problem of investment in transmission and the lower-level problems represent market outcomes obtained from clearing the market and their investment in generation capacity. Work presented in [10] proposes a sequential coordination of transmission expansion planning with strategic generation investments. Generation companies (GenCos) move first and expand their future generation capacities and then transmission company (TransCo) makes investment decisions.…”
Section: Indices and Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, objective functions can be profit maximization of a generation company in the restructured power market [9], maximizing reliability [10], [11], minimizing operating costs [12], [13], and minimizing environmental pollution [14], [15]. In addition, constraints such as network security constraints [16], [17], [18], [19] , [20] , [21], investment costs [22], [23], [24], reliability [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], and environmental pollution [30] could be part of the constraints that are required to be considered in the GEP problem. Although less attention has been paid to the GEP problem in the presence of wind power plants in the literature, extensive studies have been carried out on GEP of traditional power plants with various objective functions and constraints [31], [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%