1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf01808871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential computerized tomography changes and related final outcome in severe head injury patients

Abstract: The authors analysed the serial computerized tomography (CT) findings in a large series of severely head injured patients in order to assess the variability in gross intracranial pathology through the acute posttraumatic period and determine the most common patterns of CT change. A second aim was to compare the prognostic significance of the different CT diagnostic categories used in the study (Traumatic Coma Data Bank CT pathological classification) when gleaned either from the initial (postadmission) or the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
1
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(5 reference statements)
1
41
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Contusion expansion is well documented in both spontaneous and traumatic ICH (Servadei et al, 1995;Oertel et al, 2002;Chang et al, 2006;Chieregato et al, 2005;Lobato et al, 1991;Brott et al, 1997;Fujii et al, 1994;Lobato et al, 1997). A worse clinical outcome following spontaneous ICH is directly associated with the hematoma volume (Mayer et al, 2005a,b;Brott et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contusion expansion is well documented in both spontaneous and traumatic ICH (Servadei et al, 1995;Oertel et al, 2002;Chang et al, 2006;Chieregato et al, 2005;Lobato et al, 1991;Brott et al, 1997;Fujii et al, 1994;Lobato et al, 1997). A worse clinical outcome following spontaneous ICH is directly associated with the hematoma volume (Mayer et al, 2005a,b;Brott et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, four publications (of n>100) described a novel CT feature recognition or classification [5][6][7][8] and two described further details of the TCDB classification (table 4). 9 10 There were nine other publications but they either had sample size less than 100, 3 14-16 or made no reference to long term outcome, 17 or were concerned with only one feature of trauma, 2 or considered only patients with very mild head injury, 18 or was a duplicate publication, 19 or had mixed clinical and CT variables in one classification, 1 and were therefore excluded. The four studies included had a mean sample size of 418, none stated whether the CT readers were blind to the clinical data, only two used multivariate analyses to correct for association between CT appearance and clinical baseline variables (to test the independent predictive value of CT), and none of the individual classifications described have been validated in a relevant, independent data set.…”
Section: Systematic Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In those patients in whom a second CT scan was obtained during this time period (50 patients in the derivation set, 5.4%), the category with the worst prognosis (worst CT) was included in the analyses because it was more strongly correlated with outcome. 20 Maas et al obtained better discrimination using the individual CT characteristics. 23 We also demonstrated a prognostic value for moderate to severe deposits of blood in SAH, but the status of the basal cisterns was more important, as expected in a population of patients with a severe TBI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%