2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33353-8_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequent Systems for Lewis’ Conditional Logics

Abstract: Abstract. We present unlabelled cut-free sequent calculi for Lewis' conditional logic V and extensions, in both the languages with the entrenchment connective and the strong conditional. The calculi give rise to Pspace-decision procedures, also in the language with the weak conditional. Furthermore, they are used to prove the Craig interpolation property for all the logics under consideration, and yield a Pspace-decision procedure for a recently considered hybrid version of V.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where is the outer modality defined by A ≡ (⊥ ¬A). The rules of the calculi H L extend the calculi from [12] to the hypersequent setting and are given in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where is the outer modality defined by A ≡ (⊥ ¬A). The rules of the calculi H L extend the calculi from [12] to the hypersequent setting and are given in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can give quick alternative completeness proofs for the proposed calculi by simulating derivations in the corresponding sequent calculi from [13,12], shown in Tab. 4.…”
Section: Completeness Via Translationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are interested in internal sequent calculi, where a sequent denotes a formula of the language. Calculi of this kind have been proposed by Gent [7] and de Swart [20], and more recently in [12,13]. They are analytical and provide a decision procedure for the respective logics; on the other hand, they comprise an infinite set of rules with a variable number of premises.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first step in this direction is the calculus for the flat version of CK+ID+CSO, corresponding to KLM logic of cumulativity C and characterized by cumulative models, we conjecture that it can be extended to whole CK+CSO+ID, although the preferential semantics for the whole system is unknown. Since for preferential logics the semantics is given in terms of ordered models, it might turn out that the basic connective to consider is no longer the conditional operator, but a kind of entrenchment operator A B, whose meaning is "A is more plausible than B" (similarly to what is done in [24]) which reflects the ordered semantics more naturally. The conditional operator would then be obtained as a derived operator:…”
Section: Preferential Extensions Of Ckmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…including cumulativity (CM) and the or-axiom (CA), although the resulting systems are fairly complicated. Finally in [24] the authors provide internal calculi for Lewis' conditional logic V and some extensions. Their calculi are formulated for a language comprising the entrenchment connective, the strong and the weak conditional operator, both conditional operators can be defined in terms of the entrenchment connective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%