Sequencing platform and library preparation choices impact viral metagenomes

Abstract

BackgroundMicrobes drive the biogeochemistry that fuels the planet. Microbial viruses modulate their hosts directly through mortality and horizontal gene transfer, and indirectly by re-programming host metabolisms during infection. However, our ability to study these virus-host interactions is limited by methods that are low-throughput and heavily reliant upon the subset of organisms that are in culture. One way forward are culture-independent metagenomic approaches, but these novel methods are rarely rigorously tested, especially for studies of environmental viruses, air microbiomes, extreme environment microbiology and other areas with constrained sample amounts. Here we perform replicated experiments to evaluate Roche 454, Illumina HiSeq, and Ion Torrent PGM sequencing and library preparation protocols on virus metagenomes generated from as little as 10pg of DNA.ResultsUsing %G + C content to compare metagenomes, we find that (i) metagenomes are highly replicable, (ii) some treatment effects are minimal, e.g., sequencing technology choice has 6-fold less impact than varying input DNA amount, and (iii) when restricted to a limited DNA concentration (<1μg), changing the amount of amplification produces little variation. These trends were also observed when examining the metagenomes for gene function and assembly performance, although the latter more closely aligned to sequencing effort and read length than preparation steps tested. Among Illumina library preparation options, transposon-based libraries diverged from all others and adaptor ligation was a critical step for optimizing sequencing yields.ConclusionsThese data guide researchers in generating systematic, comparative datasets to understand complex ecosystems, and suggest that neither varied amplification nor sequencing platforms will deter such efforts.

The diversity and host interactions of Propionibacterium acnes bacteriophages on human skin

“…The lack of knowledge of the skin virome is partly due to the limited microbial biomass of skin samples, which poses challenges in determining the composition and diversity of skin viruses. As methods are being developed in recent years for high-throughput sequencing from a limited amount of DNA Solonenko et al, 2013) and for capturing metagenomic viral sequences in metagenomic sequencing data (DeLong et al, 2006;Mizuno et al, 2013), it is becoming feasible to study lowly abundant viral communities directly from metagenomic samples without enriching the viral portion. In this study, using genome sequencing and metagenomic analysis of the skin microbiome, we characterized a large number of P. acnes bacteriophages and their genome diversity in the skin of healthy individuals and acne patients.…”

Twelve previously unknown phage genera are ubiquitous in global oceans

“…51). Future work with the use of emerging viral metagenomic methods (3,51,52) to generate quantitative datasets (e.g., ref.…”

Rising to the challenge: accelerated pace of discovery transforms marine virology

“…Second, methods for the purification of viruses, using density gradients and enzymatic digestion, have been evaluated with replicated viromic data sets to guide researchers in choosing the best method for addressing their research goals 34 . Third, linker amplification of extracted nucleic acids from viral concentrates, either independently or as part of sequencing library preparations, enables near-quantitative amplification of dsDNA viral genomes, which is not possible with multiple displacement amplification as it is highly biased 35,36 . Furthermore, comparative empirical data are now available for the various sequencing platforms and library preparation methodologies, which enables researchers to make informed choices about the best methods for their specific applications 35 .…”