2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9150(00)00657-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequencing of the coding exons of the LRP1 and LDLR genes on individual DNA samples reveals novel mutations in both genes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the peak on chromosome 12 is near the location of the gene encoding the LDL lipoprotein receptor-related protein (28). LRP is a 600 kDa cell surface receptor expressed in a variety of tissues, including hepatocytes (29). LRP shows homology to the LDL receptor, but is considered more complex in structure and function, containing 31 ligand binding-type repeats, as compared with the seven found in the LDL receptor (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the peak on chromosome 12 is near the location of the gene encoding the LDL lipoprotein receptor-related protein (28). LRP is a 600 kDa cell surface receptor expressed in a variety of tissues, including hepatocytes (29). LRP shows homology to the LDL receptor, but is considered more complex in structure and function, containing 31 ligand binding-type repeats, as compared with the seven found in the LDL receptor (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because intronic Alu repeats are known to be abundant Van Leuven et al 2001), we determined their precise location within the LDLR locus. The software "repeat masker" (http://ftp.genome.washington.edu) aligns any DNA sequence with consensus Alu repeat sequences or any other genomic repeated sequence.…”
Section: Bioinformaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genotyping of the previously described genomic variants (A217V, A775P, D2080N, D2632E, G4379S) was carried out according to van Leuven et al, 2001.…”
Section: Analysis Of Genomic Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%