2009
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequencing and de novo analysis of a coral larval transcriptome using 454 GSFlx

Abstract: Background: New methods are needed for genomic-scale analysis of emerging model organisms that exemplify important biological questions but lack fully sequenced genomes. For example, there is an urgent need to understand the potential for corals to adapt to climate change, but few molecular resources are available for studying these processes in reef-building corals. To facilitate genomics studies in corals and other non-model systems, we describe methods for transcriptome sequencing using 454, as well as stra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

37
425
7
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 415 publications
(471 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(62 reference statements)
37
425
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9.9% in the razor clam Sinonovacula constricta (Niu et al, 2013), 12% in the blue mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis (Craft et al, 2010), 17% in the Antarctic bivalve Laternula elliptica (Clark et al, 2010;Meyer et al, 2009), 24% in the Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum (Milan et al, 2011), 25% in the krill Euphausia superba (Clark et al, 2011), 28% in the Yesso scallop Pactinopecten yessoensis (Hou et al, 2011) and 39% in the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus (Du et al, 2012). This is almost certainly due to the genome sequencing and annotation of a close relative; the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas (Zhang et al, 2012a).…”
Section: Functional Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9.9% in the razor clam Sinonovacula constricta (Niu et al, 2013), 12% in the blue mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis (Craft et al, 2010), 17% in the Antarctic bivalve Laternula elliptica (Clark et al, 2010;Meyer et al, 2009), 24% in the Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum (Milan et al, 2011), 25% in the krill Euphausia superba (Clark et al, 2011), 28% in the Yesso scallop Pactinopecten yessoensis (Hou et al, 2011) and 39% in the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus (Du et al, 2012). This is almost certainly due to the genome sequencing and annotation of a close relative; the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas (Zhang et al, 2012a).…”
Section: Functional Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed whole genome or transcriptome sequencing has proved a very efficient and cost effective method for expanding the sequence database for bivalves and other non-model species (i.e. Clark et al, 2010;Craft et al, 2010;Hou et al, 2011;Joubert et al, 2010;Meyer et al, 2009), and so was applied here to the transcriptome of the mangrove oyster C. brasiliana. In the last few years, several oyster genomes have become available, including the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas (Zhang et al, 2012a) and Pearl oyster Pinctada fucata (Takeuchi et al, 2012), significantly enriching the genomic resources for this animal model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DAVID uses the Fisher's exact test to ascertain statistically significant gene enrichment for a particular pathway, and significant processes were selected based on a corrected P-value o0.05. We applied the corrected P-value (Benjamini correction) with a cutoff of 0.05 for filtering the significantly enriched pathways and a P-value of 0.001 for filtering enriched GO categories (Huang da et al, 2009a;Meyer et al, 2009). …”
Section: Functional Profile and Gene Ontology (Go) Enrichment Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA extraction, quality control and analyses were performed as already described (D'Angelo et al 2008). The sequence of a coral-homolog of PCNA from the EST database of A. millepora (Meyer et al 2009) was aligned with PCNAs of higher organisms, and primers were designed against conserved regions. Fragments encoding PCNA were amplified from 500 ng cDNA using the primers: PCNA For ( 5 0atgtttgaagcaaagcttacacaaggc 3 0) and PCNA Rev ( 5 0 catattcttgttctgggatcccaag 3 0).…”
Section: Rna Preparation and Rt-pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%