2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequence-Based Prediction of Protein Solubility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our performances are comparable to other algorithms that were built to predict specific protein features. In agreement with previous observations, we found that physicochemical propensities linked to structural disorder and are relevant for RNA-binding, chaperone requirement and solubility (Agostini et al , 2012; Calloni et al , 2012; Cirillo et al , 2014), which very well captures the central role of natively unfolded proteins in higher eukaryotes (Babu et al , 2011). This observation is further supported by direct comparison of H.sapiens and E.coli proteomes, which shows enrichment in hydrophobicity and aggregation propensity for E.coli and structural disorder for H.sapiens (all links to results are provided in Supplementary Table S1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our performances are comparable to other algorithms that were built to predict specific protein features. In agreement with previous observations, we found that physicochemical propensities linked to structural disorder and are relevant for RNA-binding, chaperone requirement and solubility (Agostini et al , 2012; Calloni et al , 2012; Cirillo et al , 2014), which very well captures the central role of natively unfolded proteins in higher eukaryotes (Babu et al , 2011). This observation is further supported by direct comparison of H.sapiens and E.coli proteomes, which shows enrichment in hydrophobicity and aggregation propensity for E.coli and structural disorder for H.sapiens (all links to results are provided in Supplementary Table S1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To build a predictor of protein solubility, we took advantage of a study in which the solubility of 70% of Escherichia coli proteins was experimentally measured using an in vivo translation system (Niwa et al , 2009). In this analysis, we ranked proteins by their solubility and used top (1000 soluble proteins) and bottom (1000 insoluble proteins) elements as the positive and negative sets (Agostini et al , 2012). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is intriguing to address whether inclusion bodies are amorphous aggregates or amyloid fibrils, or a mixture of the two (6,7). Recently, it has been suggested that the propensity for aggregation is correlated with the structural classification of proteins (8) and that the thermodynamic stability of the native states is closely linked with the kinetic barriers of aggregation (9). However, it is often difficult to distinguish between amyloid fibrils and amorphous aggregates even though the two are usually distinct in their morphologies (10), so they tend to be treated together in both experimental and theoretical studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…denaturation follows first-order kinetics), partly by a remarkable optimization of electrostatic interactions in the protein native state. Thus the consensus-based approach can be efficiently applied to improve protein stability and solubility in vitro and possibly in vivo, which are known to strongly depend on protein thermodynamic and kinetic stabilities [44][45][46]. Our approach may thus have application to different fields of protein biotechnology aimed to reduce the degradation and aggregation rates of protein-based pharmaceutical drugs [47] and also, possibly, in preparations for ERT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%