DOI: 10.1016/s0882-6145(02)19009-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequence and solidarity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…What they claim to have in common is that they are designed to 'test the waters' (Clayman, 2002) -to anticipate and avoid a dispreferrred outcome (e.g. already-known-ness, declines due to lack of availability, and denials or rejections due to other circumstantial factors).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What they claim to have in common is that they are designed to 'test the waters' (Clayman, 2002) -to anticipate and avoid a dispreferrred outcome (e.g. already-known-ness, declines due to lack of availability, and denials or rejections due to other circumstantial factors).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in conversation analysis has clearly demonstrated that members of society generally seek to maintain social solidarity in encounters (Clayman, 2002). Participants work to affiliate and align with each other as they interact.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heritage (1984) describes preferred responses to a variety of initiating actions such as requests, offers, invitations, assessments, etc., as normally ''affiliative actions which are supportive of social solidarity'', and dispreferred responses as disaffiliative and ''destructive of social solidarity'' (Heritage, 1984: 268; see also Clayman, 2002). The specific features of preferred and dispreferred format responses are thus described as related to their affiliative and disaffiliative characters respectively (Heritage, 1984).…”
Section: [ 5 _ T D $ D I F F ]mentioning
confidence: 99%