“…In contrast, the noncoding regions of ITS1 and ITS2 are highly variable and evolve at a faster rate than do the coding regions (Schlo¨tterer et al, 1994). The ITS2 sequence comparisons are popular for distinguishing closely related species (e.g., Porter & Collins, 1991;Paskewitz, Wesson & Collins, 1993;Cornel, Porter & Collins, 1996;Severini et al, 1996;Walton et al, 1999;Hackett et al, 2000), for differentiation of populations (Fritz et al, 1994;Marrelli et al, 1999), for study of divergence within and between species (Tang et al, 1996;, and for reconstruction of evolutionary relationships ( e.g., Wesson, Porter & Collins, 1992;Schlo¨tterer et al, 1994;Cornel, Porter & Collins, 1996;Miller, Crabtree & Savage, 1996;Xu & Qu, 1997;Depaquit et al, 2000;Weekers, De Jonckheere & Dumont, 2001;Oliverio, Cervelli & Mariottini, 2002;Toma et al, 2002;Young & Coleman, 2004).…”