2018
DOI: 10.1021/bk-2018-1292.ch005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequence Analysis: Use of Scanpath Patterns for Analysis of Students’ Problem-Solving Strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two other methods of quantitative similarity calculations were applied. One approach involved a string-edit-distance method which had been previously used in many eye-tracking studies to compare different participant groups (i.e., [76][77][78][79]). Specifically, ScanGraph calculated the similarity of scanpaths according to Levenshtein distance (i.e., [43,80,81]) and visualized the results calculated using the multimatch method, which can only indicate similarity between two scanpaths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two other methods of quantitative similarity calculations were applied. One approach involved a string-edit-distance method which had been previously used in many eye-tracking studies to compare different participant groups (i.e., [76][77][78][79]). Specifically, ScanGraph calculated the similarity of scanpaths according to Levenshtein distance (i.e., [43,80,81]) and visualized the results calculated using the multimatch method, which can only indicate similarity between two scanpaths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undergraduate and doctoral participants' fixation transitions were compared to provide insight into differences in cognitive processing strategies between the two groups, in particular differences in the perceived complexity or importance of related information and the refreshment of working memory. 32 Mann−Whitney U test comparisons of transition counts between undergraduate and doctoral participants revealed several significant differences. All significant differences exhibited p-values less than 0.05 and medium to large effect sizes, indicating substantive differences in processing strategies (Tables S6−S9, Supporting Information).…”
Section: ■ Expertise Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on fixation transitions in problem-solving contexts has demonstrated that the number of transitions is directly proportional to dwell time, a measure which reflects the perceived complexity or importance of related information. 28,32,33 This research has also demonstrated a connection between the number of bidirectional transitions and the need to refresh working memory. 33 Cued RTA Interviewing As a Research Tool.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequential analysis has been shown to reveal a learner's overall learning behavior (Tsai et al, 2012) and that in-depth analysis of individuals' cognitive strategies during goal-oriented tasks (Hou et al, 2009) can be achieved. Moreover, Day et al (2018) found that studies on expert and novice gaze behavior could benefit from identifying patterns that appear with a higher likelihood in a specific expertise group. Consequently, the comparison of gaze sequences using measures of string similarity, such as the Levensthein distance (Levenshtein, 1966), has successfully advanced our understanding of expertise development by showing that experts' eye movements are more similar to each other than to those of lower expertise levels (Kanan et al, 2015;Tien et al, 2015;Watalingam et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for the analysis of perceptual expertise development, two central aspects have yet to be considered. First, although the commonly applied string-edit approaches consider sequential gaze information during sequence comparison, the spatial and the temporal object relationship is lost after the similarity score calculation (Cristino et al, 2010;Day et al, 2018). Thus, after showing that differences between experts and novices exist, the question remains as to which task-specific gaze sequences can be consistently measured in expert eye movements and whether a suitable ET metric can be found that allows quantification of visual expertise development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%