2018
DOI: 10.1111/srt.12578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequels to tattoo removal by caustic products

Abstract: Tattoo removal by caustic products can cause severe and chronic sequels with dissatisfaction despite therapeutic interventions to correct disfiguring changes. Removal by caustic products is freely permitted. Products are obscured and liability and consumer protection is unacceptable; limitation is needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Caustic, strongly acidic, or strongly oxidant products for tattoo removal are marketed as cosmetic products, and on free sale despite the obscure dose-effect control and the very high risk of scars. 11,12 Laser removal requiring 8-12 treatment sessions, and given with a minimum interval of 6 weeks, is expensive and cumbersome to fulfill, and there is therefore a need for new or supplementary methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Caustic, strongly acidic, or strongly oxidant products for tattoo removal are marketed as cosmetic products, and on free sale despite the obscure dose-effect control and the very high risk of scars. 11,12 Laser removal requiring 8-12 treatment sessions, and given with a minimum interval of 6 weeks, is expensive and cumbersome to fulfill, and there is therefore a need for new or supplementary methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last decade, a (renewed) trend of alternative tattoo removal has emerged, including caustic removal cremes containing lactic acid or other chemicals. These aggressive products are not well studied and can cause severe ulceration and scarring 45 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning complications of tattoo removal processes, particularly conventional non-laser methods, can result in chronic scarring, redness, and itching and dyspigmentation. This is another scenario in which victims seek additional medical, surgical, and psychological treatments [76].…”
Section: Tattoo Regretmentioning
confidence: 99%