2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-020-01657-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Septum-Based Mammaplasties: Surgical Techniques and Evaluation of Nipple–Areola Sensibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some drawbacks of these tools, e.g., dependence on the skill of the user and the quality and maintenance of the product [26,27]. There are data showing that normal breast sensibility using Semmes-Weinstein nylon monofilaments yields results varying by a magnitude that exceeds 10-fold and that computed devices (Pressure-Specified Sensory Devices) provide results with significantly higher inter-observer reliability [12,28]. However, there are also studies suggesting that monofilaments, if used precisely and adequately, retain the advantages of being an evidence-based, reproducible, affordable, accessible tool for assessing touching sensibility [25,27,[29][30][31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some drawbacks of these tools, e.g., dependence on the skill of the user and the quality and maintenance of the product [26,27]. There are data showing that normal breast sensibility using Semmes-Weinstein nylon monofilaments yields results varying by a magnitude that exceeds 10-fold and that computed devices (Pressure-Specified Sensory Devices) provide results with significantly higher inter-observer reliability [12,28]. However, there are also studies suggesting that monofilaments, if used precisely and adequately, retain the advantages of being an evidence-based, reproducible, affordable, accessible tool for assessing touching sensibility [25,27,[29][30][31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it ensures a more inferior-central pedicle. 19 On the other hand, Ümran et al showed that there are no statistically significant differences between the inferior and superomedial pedicle. 20 In our study, a majority of the patients retained sensation or regained it within first 6months during the post-operative period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We found a greater number of contralateral balancing in group A (43.7% versus 25.0%; P = 0.264), probably because of the need of the patient who has already undergone a mastectomy to reach a complete and more pleasant result. 45 The small sample size is a limitation of the study, which was found to be not powered to identify differences regarding aesthetic evaluation based on post hoc analysis. Nevertheless, an aesthetic analysis of the two groups was also performed along with the analysis of the clinical results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found a greater number of contralateral balancing in group A (43.7% versus 25.0%; P = 0.264), probably because of the need of the patient who has already undergone a mastectomy to reach a complete and more pleasant result. 45…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%